Comment on Suspected 4chan Hack Could Expose Longtime, Anonymous Admins

• cyborganism@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  You mean, people who operate a platform where people’s privacy constantly gets violated should have a right to their own privacy?

  I dunno. I understand your point, but OP is also kind of right.

  source

  • DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Rights are unchangeable based on circumstances. They can never be revoked.

    Privlivges can be.

    source

    • futatorius@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      Rights are unchangeable based on circumstances.

      Absolutely false.

      They can never be revoked.

      They’re regularly revoked in all developed countries, mainly as the result of criminal proceedings. Unless you think that prisoners are afforded the same rights as the rest of us?

      And the Enlightenment notion that there are inalienable rights endowed by the Creator is about as quaint as the idea that there’s a Creator. Rights are ideals that must be continually fought for and expanded, not the gift of a beneficent Alpha Male in the Sky

      source
• ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  lots of rights get modified, curtailed, or eliminated by the larger society based on misuse or misbehavior or other transgressions.

  (or positions of power, etc…)

  source
• Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  All rights are privileges, if we’re going to be pedantic. This is evidenced by the fact that they can be taken away. Society tends to operate on an unspoken, collective agreement that certain rights should never be violated, but if they were actually intrinsic, we wouldn’t have to fight tooth and nail for them.

  I’m a moral relativist, so if someone is happy to abuse their right to privacy to harm others or otherwise take their rights away, especially the right to privacy, I don’t feel any compunction to draw a hard line and say that the harmful person deserves to keep those rights in spite of their actions.

  source

  • O4PetesSake@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Those collective agreements include stipulations for what happens to someone who violates other’s rights. They lose some rights themselves.

    source
  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    All rights are privileges, if we’re going to be pedantic. This is evidenced by the fact that they can be taken away.

    I know you don’t intend for me to hear this, but I heard George Carlin as you typed that. He has a whole bit on rights vs privileges.

    source

    • Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Oh? I’m not that familiar with his comedy, but I probably should get to know it. What little I know I like!

      source

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        People call him a comedian, and if you define comedy as “something you find funny”, then yeah. By that definition, he’s a comedian.

        But really he’s just a philosopher who points out lifes absurdities, and it’s the contrast between the truth, and what people feel permitted by society to say outloud that’s the basis of his comedy.

        He makes you get feelings such as “What? You can’t say that!” And then he does a routine, and you think “Actually, he has a point, it feels wrong to say that, but he has a point”

        And here’s the biggest thing about him that people don’t understand. He died in 2008. So people always like to say “Oh, I wonder what he’d say about politics and society today! He’d probably have a whole thing on trump!”

        To which I say he already did that. His material holds up because society doesn’t change. The same shit that was true in 1844 is the same shit we’re dealing with today. Race, power, money, status, war. It’s a tale older than recorded history. We don’t learn. We keep repeating the same paterns as our fathers generation, just as he did for his fathers generation, just as he did for his fathers generation. And so on and so on and so on. Small details change, but the landscape of human behavior is unaffected. History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.

        Anyways, here’s a bit from him. I didn’t watch it but based on the title, I’m fairly sure it’s the clip you reminded me of

        source
  • sepi@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    aka the golden rule

    source

    • Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I prefer the platinum rule of humanism, but essentially, yes.

      source
• rtxn@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  “Live and let live” obviously doesn’t work. 4chan has done so much damage to the world that I wouldn’t mind seeing their big players in gallows in the town square.

  source

  • futatorius@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    I just want to know who provided them with funding and other support.

    source
• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I’d say it’s more like a right that’s been taken away and they’re okay with that.

  source
• essteeyou@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  If you’re breaking the law then you forfeit your rights in favor of some much more restrictive ones.

  source

  • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    did the moderators violate the law though?

    source
• el_muerte@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Do you believe liberty is a right? It’s one of the first laid out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and yet I don’t think a single signatory nation doesn’t incarcerate people guilty of crime. By your logic, I don’t think there are any true “rights” in existence, because there are circumstance in which any of them can be taken away.

  source