DoPeopleLookHere
@DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on moving from nextcloud to opencloud 1 week ago:
I was indeed. Kagi gave me an og repo.
- Comment on moving from nextcloud to opencloud 1 week ago:
I was indeed looking at an old one
- Comment on moving from nextcloud to opencloud 1 week ago:
Is it maintained? I just looked up their GitHub and it’s been 4 years, and the repo is archived. I wouldn’t install if it’s not getting updates…
- Comment on Is Kagy web browser worth it? 1 week ago:
You still haven’t explained the incentive, just postured that it must exist.
- Comment on Man Alarmed to Discover His Smart Vacuum Was Broadcasting a Secret Map of His House 2 weeks ago:
Sure, if your physically able to do it all that is.
Things like these are important to disabled folks.
- Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants 2 weeks ago:
Because libertarians are the first to remove legal protections in the name of small government. This isnt a blanket rule, more anecdotal than anything. But the ones I’ve managed to find and interact with all want to remove all sorts of legal protections.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
And it’s important to know, if that’s your attitude, your gonna get laughed out of every open source circle.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Why the fuck would I when your this hostile?
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Also since you complained no one looked at your code, you have support for plain text passwords in your code. That’s a huge no no.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Hokay. So docker does run as root. Podman can run rootless, but docker does run as root.
So if you have any vulnerabilities in your code, like say remote code execution, than your app already has access to root.
Also, don’t pretend like your shit don’t stink. My code has bugs. And I’ve been at this a a decade. Your vibe coded thing isnt going to be secure because you probably don’t even know how to make it secure if you don’t know docker runs as root.
Here’s where I interject my opnion
Its fine to do this for yourself. If you wanted to hear how great your AI produced slop go to LinkedIn.
When you share things to be used by others, you have a responsibility yourself. How will you monitor and package up security updates? What kind of depenecinies do you have? Are they up to date? Do they have any CVEs?
There’s so much more to publishing than good intentions. Its fine to do something like this for yourself. But to publish and then absolve yourself of any responsibility is not a way to get taken seriously.
- Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants 2 weeks ago:
You say the open source line, and then apply it to a project that doesn’t value those values.
Free as in freedom comes without restrictions like commercial use.
If that low bar of source avaialble (last I checked you have to request the source). That’s fine.
But for a lot of FOSS people its not because it means you can never learn from the code, and apply it in your paying job. Or in your own project that suddenly gets big. Then suddenly someone is knocking demanding money.
Its about the community as much about the code.
- Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants 2 weeks ago:
Yes, however those aren’t “copy left” licenses like AGPL whose defining feature is the owner not holding copyright
- Comment on If only we knew... 3 weeks ago:
Do you think it’s genetic? Like we will still learn about Nazis, and so long as we do there will be people who agree with it.
- Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants 3 weeks ago:
Once you go copy left, you need everyone’s consent to change the license.
The MIT license is the creator owns the copyright, and any changes you contribute are licesned under the sam MIT as the project.
So to go from MIt -> anything only requires the consent of the project onwer.
Any copy left (like AGPL) license -> anything requires every contributors consent.
- Comment on Futo updates their website, removing logos, clarifying micro grants 3 weeks ago:
Copyright.
AGPL says that the original author of any chunk of code owns the copyright to it.
Meaning to change the license you have to get every copyright holder (read every developer who has contributed code) to agree to the license change and give over the copy right.
- Comment on How AI and Wikipedia have sent vulnerable languages into a doom spiral 3 weeks ago:
Yes those Greenlanders should be able to read all of Wikipedia without learning English and even if the project has no human translators
Again, your assuming a high level of accuracy from these tools. If LLM garbage leaves it unreadable, is that actually better?
- Comment on How AI and Wikipedia have sent vulnerable languages into a doom spiral 3 weeks ago:
Is it even getting misused? Spreading knowledge via machine translation where there are no human translators available, had to be better than not translating. As long as there is transparency so people can judge the results
Assumes the AI is accurate, which is debatable
- Comment on Huge internet outage live blog: Amazon, Disney+, Hulu, HBO Max and more experiencing issues 3 weeks ago:
Yes, the argument is about spending money to migrate, because how else do we decouple the single points of failure, if not to migrate away?
- Comment on Huge internet outage live blog: Amazon, Disney+, Hulu, HBO Max and more experiencing issues 3 weeks ago:
Sure, but how much money is that worth to an individual company? Because migration is not easy or cheap. And your not getting more reliability…
- Comment on Huge internet outage live blog: Amazon, Disney+, Hulu, HBO Max and more experiencing issues 3 weeks ago:
Did you miss my point?
Why would a company move away from AWS?
Because everyone has outages…
- Comment on Huge internet outage live blog: Amazon, Disney+, Hulu, HBO Max and more experiencing issues 3 weeks ago:
Okay, you know those have outages too right?
Like sure, it wouldn’t be all together like this, but that’s also not a reasonable ask for a lot of big cloud customers without huge investments for not actually anything extra.
- Comment on Huge internet outage live blog: Amazon, Disney+, Hulu, HBO Max and more experiencing issues 3 weeks ago:
Can you name a more reliable alternative? With citations?
Because every major cloud provider has outages. On prem clouds also have outages. Everyone does.
- Comment on I went to an anti-tech rally, where Gen Z dressed as gnomes and smashed iPhones. Here's what I learned. | Business Insider 4 weeks ago:
Headphones is a good start…
- Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists? 4 weeks ago:
The Nazis are a completely different story. It wasn’t that they saw Jews as a cost or as objects, it’s that they saw them as less than objects, they viewed them as actively threatening the country.
I didn’t say that’s where it ended, it starts with stripping people’s humanity away by thinking of them as a number in your record books. Just like your suggesting.
As in, this was active hate, not apathy.
Your going to straight face tell me that this isn’t what tump is doing? Rounding up immigrants and trans people as antifa?
It’s not apathy right now. It’s active hate. Go to any protest and see the right wingers with their attitude. See the Israelites in the US loose their mind on people standing up for Palestinians.
I assume you’re talking about gun rights?
No. Human Rights.
When the ‘left’ calls for and protests for not killing of black (see what Kyle Rittenhouse did), Muslims, immigrants, trans people, ect… It’s always shut up no one cares.
And the GOP only has power, so long as the people that vote for them support them. And they elected a Nazi crew, so yes, my problem is with the people who voted for this hate.
- Comment on The Discord Breach Might Be Worse Than We Thought, As The Hacker Is Said To Have Two Million Age Verification Photos 5 weeks ago:
Im sorry but I need a verb there.
- Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists? 5 weeks ago:
I think it makes logical sense. They own a business, so they see everything as a cost, and that includes employee benefits. They’re merely voting for their self interests.
Can you see how dehumanizing that is? Viewing people as cost?
This is how Nazis start by the way, not viewing people as people
Employees are still people. Business should take care of people, not the other way arround.
That’s their purpose. Conservatives are pretty universally against change/in favor of reverting change, while liberals want more change. Sometimes you want one more than the other, depending on what’s going on.
Your assumption is that every side serves a purpose. But when we say “hey we shouldn’t kill people” and the answer is “shut up libtard” can you see how they don’t have a “purpose” other than to spread hate?
And I’m not gonna copy and paste the rest of them comment.
I know who my problem with is, is it’s just hate. Not exclusively politicians, anyone who wants to seee dead.
Can I just say, get fucked? Must be nice when your existence isnt political.
- Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists? 5 weeks ago:
It’s not about sending a message. It’s about cutting off funds to hate.
- Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists? 5 weeks ago:
Wow. Okay. Thats a really bad response.
The furthest I’ve seen is advocating for conservative politicians, which is generally for more favorable tax treatment and maybe some more flexibility in what services they need to provide to their employees.
First off, that’s still indefensible? Like advocating for less worker safety isn’t a good thing right? Or lower pay? Like those are all agreeable bad things for companies to be doing right?
We’ll come back to the second “where the money comes from”.
I don’t think business owners care about the trans community for good or ill.
That’s a pretty broad brush there.
Chick-fil-A does a pretty good job of showing you that’s not a rule by any means.
The only reason it seems that conservatives care at all is because liberals are so vocal about it. And liberals aren’t even really pushing for anything to help the trans community, it’s mostly lip service.
This makes no sense, If neither side cares, then why is it a problem?
Also, why are conservatives in your view just reactionary to what every ‘liberals’ are saying?
The real enemy isn’t you average conservative voter, but specific politicians pushing a populist agenda, which paints trans people as the enemy. If it wasn’t trans people, it would be gay people, some variety of immigrant, etc, the target is less important to the movement, they just need to be weak and unpopular enough for them to get away with it. Again, it’s not your average voter, but whoever is pushing that agenda.
This is so submissive to hate. Heaven forbid we don’t tolerate intolerance? This is such dismissive “it’s the way it is” talk.
I never said my problem is with the average voter (although the average Republican voter absolutely hate my guts). My problem is with the money that flows. It’s the money fueling this hate. So yes, where I spend money has ALWAYS been political. So yes, it matters who my money is funding, and if that fund is funding my danger.
- Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists? 5 weeks ago:
That’s a lot of bending over the point of money has always been political.
- Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists? 5 weeks ago:
I saw this just this morning.
If you have a space for sheep’s and wolves, you’ll only have wolves.
Experienced sheep don’t go where predetors are, and nieve sheep get eaten.
Same applies to spaces. If ‘everyone’ is welcome, you’ll soon find it to not include everyone.