Comment on The IP Laws That Stop Disenshittification.

Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• Rentlar@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Stop non-antidisenshittification.

  source
• brandon@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The enshittification of the English language.

  source
• captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Antidisenshittificationism.

  source

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Retroantidisenshitificationalidizing!

    source
• bassomitron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Agreed, it’s an awful headline

  source
• calabast@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You’re not wrong

  source
• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You cant remove that double negative without making it incorrect. Its specifically about laws that prevent you from mitigating or bypassing enshittified parts of already enshittified platforms.

  They also cause enshittification, but thats not what the article is about.

  source

  • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    You cant remove that double negative without making it incorrect

    Sure you can: The IP Laws That Reinforce Enshittification.

    source

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That is not the same thing though. Your version sounds like the laws accelerate enshittification where the original is about the laws stopping a reversal of the enshittification that already happened in the past.

      source

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        IP Laws that Enable Enshitifcation.

        source
  • SaltSong@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I’d go with “deshittification,” myself. It’s not important how or why they are shit, just that they are, and the laws in question prevent us from fixing it.

    source