It‘s a duopoly and I doubt the US will tackle this problem. At least the EU has started doing something about it.
Elizabeth Warren slammed for wanting to ‘break up Apple’s smartphone monopoly’
Submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Hiko0@feddit.de 7 months ago
MudMan@fedia.io 7 months ago
Some nuance to that. The software platform is a duopoly, the hardware is not.
Not that it matters too much, because anticompetitive practices don't need a 100% or even a 50% market share.
chalk46@kbin.social 6 months ago
and even then, Android is mostly open source.
I've personally updated the kernel to my Amazon Fire tablet (and believe me, the 3.18 branch doesn't contain as many security backports as they'd have you believe)Hiko0@feddit.de 6 months ago
Correct. But hardware is not the problem here, I‘d say.
rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
US won’t tackle it because it’s a hegemon and in mercantilist terms benefits from it.
The EU and everybody else are, in fact, interested in changing this.
But - if nobody remembers, there was a certain TRON Project in Japan. Read up how it ended. Now, US threatening Japan with trade sanctions to preserve some oligopoly and US threatening EU with trade sanctions with the same goal are two different things, the latter is harder.
Hiko0@feddit.de 6 months ago
You‘re right. That‘s why we need a strong EU and multilateral partnerships to counter US and Chinese ambitions.
guycls@lemmy.world 6 months ago
S L A M M ED
RGB3x3@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Absolutely fucking STOMPED ON
Drusenija@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Article text if you can’t be bothered getting around the subscription popup.
–
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she’s not a fan of “green texts on iPhones” and that it’s “time to break up Apple’s smartphone monopoly,” but statistics show the tech giant doesn’t have exclusive control over the market.
The Department of Justice announced a sweeping antitrust lawsuit against Apple in March, accusing the California-based company of engineering an illegal monopoly in smartphones that boxes out competitors, stifles innovation and keeps prices artificially high.
Warren took to social media this week, displaying her support for the suit that takes aim at how Apple allegedly molds its technology and business relationships to “extract more money from consumers, developers, content creators, artists, publishers, small businesses, and merchants, among others.”
Warren specifically called out how people who don’t have iPhones are blocked from sending blue iMessages as messages from Androids and other devices are green. Those without iPhones also face other restrictions, the Massachusetts senator added.
“Green texts on iPhones, they’re ruining relationships. That’s right,” Warren said in a video posted on X Thursday. “Non-iPhone users everywhere are being excluded from group texts. From sports teams chats to birthday chats to vacation plan chats, they’re getting cut out.”
“And who’s to blame here? Apple,” she continued . “That’s just one of the dirty tactics that Apple uses to keep a stranglehold on the smartphone market. … It’s time to break up Apple’s monopoly now.”
Critics quickly called Warren out for spreading misinformation and for focusing on what they believe is a non-issue.
“It would be nice if Android users could use iMessage features,” an X user responded, “but why would anyone think this sort of micromanaging of businesses is the legitimate role of the government?”
An alert attached to Warren’s post shows context that readers added and “thought people might want to know.” It includes data from Statista highlighting how the iPhone had a 57% market share compared to Android’s 42% in North America, as of January.
The alert, which was removed as of Friday evening, also contained information from Investopedia around how a “monopoly is exclusive control, or no close substitutes. The current market share of iPhone v Android does not meet that definition.”
Attorneys general from 16 states filed the lawsuit with the Department of Justice in federal court in New Jersey. Massachusetts AG Andrea Campbell did not sign onto the suit which seeks to stop Apple from undermining technologies that compete with its own apps — in areas including streaming, messaging and digital payments.
The suit is the latest example of aggressive antitrust enforcement by an administration that has also taken on Google, Amazon and other tech giants with the stated aim of making the digital universe more fair, innovative and competitive.
“If left unchallenged, Apple will only continue to strengthen its smartphone monopoly,” Attorney General Merrick B. Garland said in a statement last month. “The Justice Department will vigorously enforce antitrust laws that protect consumers from higher prices and fewer choices.”
Apple has called the suit “wrong on the facts and the law” and said it “will vigorously defend against it.”
If successful, the lawsuit would “hinder our ability to create the kind of technology people expect from Apple — where hardware, software, and services intersect” and would “set a dangerous precedent, empowering the government to take a heavy hand in designing people’s technology,” the company said in a statement last month.
thehatfox@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Thing is with the iMessage argument is nobody is forced to use it. If green bubbles really are “ruining relationships” wouldn’t Americans be installing WhatsApp or another messenger like the rest of the world?
There are plenty of good reasons to criticise Apple’s behaviour. But I’m not convinced the popularity of iMessage is one of them.
andrew0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 months ago
How will you move to WhatsApp if everyone else uses iMessage? Europe has the same issue, but reversed. Everyone uses WhatsApp and can’t jump to Signal/Telegram because they’re not that well known.
rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 6 months ago
Actually that’s the case where she, being incompetent, found the right point to press.
She literally attacks the use of network effect to preserve oligopoly. Not knowing that.
And yeah, there is deniability for Apple in the sense that “this isn’t intentional, normies are just creating these ape social dynamics all by themselves”, but their ads etc have pretty consistent emotional messages. Yes, they do endorse it.
And they couldn’t refrain from their usual bullshit even in the answer to this.
stoy@lemmy.zip 7 months ago
I didn’t know Apple was a monopoly…
They are absolute dicks with iMessage, but they are not a monopoly.
I am an iPhone user, and I don’t get why people look down on the green bubbles, I have several friends with Android phones, we can all send images and texts to eachother, sure the photos are reduced in size, but it’s fine.
Just implement the new message standard, Apple and stop being dicks
MudMan@fedia.io 7 months ago
You kinda walked that back by yourself, I think. The point of anticompetitive practices isn't having a 100% market share, it's having a position of strength to enforce your control of the market.
So... you know, being dicks.
Enforcing a single form of in-platform commerce where you get a share and banning all other ways to sell or install software, downgrading the quality of media generated by your competitors, bundling your own unrelated software and adding roadblocks to competing alternatives... all of that is part of what's being discussed here.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
They haven’t implemented RCS because it’s a dumpster with no redeeming qualities.
“RCS” only works on Android because Google did a bunch of their own shit outside the spec to make it remotely functional. They’re trying to use legislature to bully their way into controlling the standard by forcing Apple to use it.
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Yup, and pretending otherwise is just head burying
Persen@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Well, it partialy works, but it just uses google’s servers and there isn’t any alternative apps for it.
Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 6 months ago
If you use slammed in your headline I already know it’s going to be the most garbage bullshit I’ve ever read
ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I’m getting really tired of the word slammed, maybe writers need to pick up a thesaurus (it’s a dinosaur that knows a lot of words).
Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 7 months ago
I quite like it because you can spot shitty journalism from a mile away and not click the link
takeda@lemmy.world 7 months ago
But you just did…
ramirezmike@programming.dev 6 months ago
I studied news journalism in college and they kinda hammered in that in news journalism it’s more important to communicate information consistently and to target a wide audience than it is to make “good writing.”
There are style guides you have to follow and words like “slammed” end up getting used a lot despite not quite being accurate because they’re words that are used a lot.
The other thing is that usually the person writing the headlines isn’t the journalist… and sometimes they do a lot of versions of the same headline and when people click more because of the word slammed it ends up sticking.
theluddite@lemmy.ml 6 months ago
Your comment perfectly encapsulates one of the central contradictions in modern journalism. You explain the style guide, and the need to communicate information in a consistent way, but then explain that the style guide is itself guided by business interests, not by some search for truth, clarity, or meaning.
I’ve been a long time reader of FAIR.org and i highly recommend them to anyone in this thread who can tell that something is up with journalism but has never done a dive into what exactly it is. Modern journalism has a very clear ideology (in the sorta zizek sense, not claiming that the journalists do it nefariously). Once you learn to see it, it’s everywhere
aeronmelon@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Boston Herald Slammed On Lemmy By ChihuahuaOfDoom For Its Verbal Tone
slaacaa@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Angry reader slammed article due to a word in its title - you might surprised to find out which
Entropywins@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Slammed…
doublejay1999@lemmy.world 7 months ago
the journalist version*thersaurus hyperbolus * is a much lighter animal.
RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 7 months ago
“waffle stomped”