useless article. mentions dns: zero times.
He is so focused on the client he loses track of why you'd not want your local isp to do anything more than route your vpnd packets.
You probably don't need a VPN
Submitted 10 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.spacebar.news/you-dont-need-a-vpn/
Comments
originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 months ago
lovesickoyster@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This article is such bullshit - every single paragraph is the same “vpn protects you against this but there’s this fringe case where it does not so you don’t need a vpn”.
Garbanzo@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I most definitely do need a VPN. I’m completely over being subscribed to multiple streaming services and trying to remember/figure out which one has which shows. VPN service is cheaper and everything I want to watch ends up in one place. 🦜🏴☠️
narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 10 months ago
The article specifically states that using one for piracy is recommended. Hence the use of the word “probably” in the title.
wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
Nice try FBI.
rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Protect your privacy and use a no log VPN. This article is just as much bs as he claims VPN marketing is.
MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Get fucked.
ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
The ol “I had a quota to fill and I hate and/or don’t understand something people like” form of journalism again I see.
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Ironic:
Most advertising networks, including Google Ads, primarily use cross-site cookies (eventually to be replaced by the Privacy Sandbox)
Which includes the link to the same blog, where the guy gives you instructions to disable Privacy Sandbox.
If you say VPNs can be subverted because other tracking identifiers can be used too, why providing instructions for disabling the other tracking identifiers, but encourage people to avoid disabling something as prevalent as an IP address?
OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Do not understand the downvotes and comments saying article is bullshit. Maybe it all depends on country / ISP, but I have never even thought I need VPN where I live.
Only meaningful reason I can think of privacy wise are these scenarios:
A)
- You have a static IP and it gets leaked with other info like your real name / personal mail address from site A
- Only your IP is leaked for site B
- By cross referencing site A and B info, you can determine identity for site B user
B)
- You have a static IP and it gets leaked with other info like your real name / personal mail address from site A
- You visit site B and whoever has logs of that site could tie your actions to your identity by using leaks from site A breach
TheDeepState@lemmy.world 10 months ago
In order to get back on Reddit, I need a VPN.
BlackPit@feddit.ch 10 months ago
This article is disingenuous at best and either fueled by ignorance or malice. Another comment suggested it wasn’t officially sponsored, but it still could’ve been bought. Having said, I have to agree with some of the sentiment. I’ve seen advertising on public TV from the likes of NordVPN that is downright fraudulent. Their claims are deceptive and unfounded. Then there’s the recent acquisition of Express and PIA by an old school scammer/spammer. Additionally, many free VPNs are actually surveillance malware and SHOULD be avoided. Any encryption offered publicly by large corporate data-stealing privacy-abusing parasites should be avoided in any form.
For anyone reading this that is hesitant to using VPN because of the article, be encouraged that VPNs are extremely effective at securing your data during transit. They are NOT an outright privacy tool, but can be used as part of your privacy plan. VPNs do NOT make you anonymous! A truthful VPN service provider will say this openly. Like IVPN (Bottom of front page) and Mullvad , both of which attempt to educate customers .
If you’re someone who finds it hard to trust any company whatsoever, then you can host VPN yourself. Admittedly a learning curve to hurdle, but regardless of which method you choose, if your provider is genuine then I see it as a necessity in the effort to keep loved ones safer.
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Just use Mullvad or Tor, this article is garbage
BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 10 months ago
Nice try.
CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This article is basically summed up: “VPNs don’t completely eliminate your digital footprint, so don’t use them unless you need to accomplish these specific things.”
It seems pretty disingenuous to discourage people from taking steps to protect their privacy in this way. It may not be sponsored, but it’s still bullshit.
corbin@infosec.pub 10 months ago
VPNs don’t really protect your privacy though, except in cases where you’ve already eliminated other means of tracking (e.g. fresh incognito browser tab + VPN). Every website and service I use still has a record of my activity if I’m logged in, advertiser networks have other means of tracking you, etc.
The issue is buying a VPN and thinking that’s the end of it.
xenspidey@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
It protects your ip address, and your ISP from knowing what you’re doing. It also protects you on public wifi from nefarious actors. VPN’s aren’t meant to protect you from Google advertising while checking your Gmail account…
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 10 months ago
They certainly increase your privacy.
Nothing “protects”, that’s an absolute. Everything we do are steps toward increasing privacy.
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Perfect is the enemy of good, isn’t it…
tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 10 months ago
They are the specific thing that I do while using the internet too.
But you’re right that any use of the internet could use any increase towards privacy.