This is such a non story. It requires physical access to unattended devices and a sophisticated attack.
[deleted]
Submitted 1 year ago by Jezebelley@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
soljin@lemm.ee 1 year ago
A_A@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Only 1 ? Are you kidding ??
BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Also “may”.
Like I’ve been workin with Windows since v1.x ( when it was really an overglorified file manager on DOS) and we’ve been complaining about it’s security issues since then.
NT at least brought some security with actual user logins and NTFS (thanks to DEC, which created the OS that NT came from), but even then, the code running in ring 0…oh boy.
Windows is a security problem.
skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Yeah, it’s the entire thing /s
Diplomjodler@feddit.de 1 year ago
Do you have a few minutes to talk about our Lord and Saviour, Linus Torvalds?
hh93@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Solving security issues with the fingerprint scanner by not supporting it in the first place?
orclev@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Me seeing headline: uh oh
Me seeing the first sentence of article: oh, nevermind, turns out I don’t actually care.
Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Title creator forgot to add “again, and again, and again”.
Oh, the holy trinity of security problems and getting hacked: Windows, Exchange, Active Directory. How would hackers cope without them?
muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Windows has a security problem. Wow im so suprised
BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Windows is the actual security problem there…
mvirts@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Lol and how many users actually have encrypted data on win 11?
CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Nearly every enterprise machine is encrypted with bitlocker
Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Meanwhile in Linux:
boots to emergency root shell from the grub menu
Problem, linux?
sarchar@programming.dev 1 year ago
Full disk encryption.
LoafyLemon@kbin.social 1 year ago
Laughs in systemd
mvirts@lemmy.world 1 year ago
A sure sign you won’t find anything interesting on that machine 😹
bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 year ago
You can configure Linux such that that isn’t possible.
Hexagon@feddit.it 1 year ago
This blew my little cousin’s mind when I showed him this trick, and he realized the implications. Fun times
ben_dover@lemmy.world 1 year ago
you don’t say!
mvirts@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ha.
Teknikal@lemm.ee 1 year ago
If someone has physical access I mean it’s almost a certainty they’ll get in anyway, I’m pretty sure it’s always been quite easy to remove passwords etc on windows.
Not something I’ve done myself but yeah I’ve always took that as a given.
xep@kbin.social 1 year ago
Saved you a click.
subignition@kbin.social 1 year ago
If a malicious actor has physical access to your machine, you have already lost. Been that way since the dawn of computing. Full-disk encryption can potentially protect your data from unauthorized access, but it can't really stop a thief from wiping the laptop and making it their own. And if you get it back you probably want to wipe it anyway.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Also can’t stop someone from cloning the disk and waiting until quantum computing is cheap enough to crack it.
Nougat@kbin.social 1 year ago
So it’s not Windows, it’s hardware.