YouTube wants to get you watching more news from ‘authoritative sources’ - The Verge

Comments

• Jerkface@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Then why do they still shove Prager U down my throat? Absolutely ridiculous.

  source

  • ijeff@lemdro.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Seriously. I inevitably get all of the right-wing questionable sources as recommendations each time.

    source
  • tb_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Oh but PragerU is now recognised in Florida and will be permitted in schools!

    source
• demonsword@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I’d hazard that YouTube consider as “authoritative sources” only right-wing, billionaire-owned news media conglomerates. Thanks, but no thanks

  source

  • drekly@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Lol which moron downvoted you? NO I LIKE MY BILLIONAIRE PROPAGANDA KEEP THE LIES AND OUTRAGE COMING

    source

    • demonsword@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      lol let the billionaire bootlikers downvote all they want… it’s not like imaginary Lemmy upvote points have any value anyway :)

      source
• jet@hackertalks.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Ministry of Truth

  source

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Ahhh, post modern “there is no truth”.

    Just because CNN has flaws doesn’t mean it’s not a better source of information than “louder with crowder”.

    Organizations that have standards and make reasonable attempts to be accurate should be promoted over “Dave’s rage blog”.

    source
  • Sneptaur@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It’s probably better in the long run. Extremism is linked with violence (more from the right than the left, but) and YouTube is a global platform. It’s likely they will be trying to push more moderate content that gets the facts right over sensational opinion.

    source

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      One would hope but that isn’t what makes them money.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
    • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      They’d probably filter out any too harsh content too, so that we can live in our little cotton insulated world’s…

      I mean they’ll decide what is “bad”, and that’s probably bad in itself.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • between2boobies@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    We have always been at war with Eastasia.

    source
• RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You can click on leftist content and you get random videos in the suggested videos. You click on anything near the center or right wing: “Here are some more videos on hating women, lgbtqia+, people of color, immigrants etc… OH! Nearly forgot! Here is a video of a piece of shit guy laughing at and doxxing disabled people!”

  They push you right down the fascist rabbit hole…

  source

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Don’t forget the 37 random ads interspersed throughout…

    source
• skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Ugh, all authoritive sources are owned by right wingers, just some are overtly stupid and other ones are vauge centerist trying to convince us problems don’t exist and wishing we would stop caring about trans people.

  source

  • ijeff@lemdro.id ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Not the public broadcasters!

    source
• autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is the best summary I could come up with:

  ---

  It also plans to spend $1.6 million to promote the creation of news content for its shortform Shorts service.

  According to Google, the new watch page experience will initially roll out on mobile in around 40 countries and will expand to its desktop and living room interfaces in the future.

  Meanwhile, the Google-owned video platform is also pledging to spend $1.6 million to promote the creation of shortform Shorts news content with over 20 organizations across 10 countries.

  Meta has made it clear that it doesn’t plan to actively court or promote news content on Threads.

  More recently, he added that Threads “won’t proactively recommend news content to people who don’t seek it out.”

  Under his leadership, X no longer shows headlines on articles shared on the platform and has dismantled the system that verified journalists.

  ---

  The original article contains 498 words, the summary contains 136 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  source