How do you even compare something that generates energy for decades and can then be recycled and generate energy for further decades vs something that you use once and then it’s gone forever?
Solar is now 41% cheaper than fossil fuels, UN report shows
Submitted 1 day ago by gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to energy@slrpnk.net
Comments
kibiz0r@midwest.social 1 day ago
whyrat@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
By price, obviously!
/s (but a little bit not /s?)
kibiz0r@midwest.social 23 hours ago
I mean, sure, but it’s comparing $ per kWh vs $ per kW
Cort@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
(Total cost of install + total expected maintenance + fuel costs) / expected lifespan
The catch is that solar is outliving the expected lifespan estimated and warranty periods which means things still tilt towards legacy fuels (doesn’t tip enough in their favor to make them less expensive though)
DaddleDew@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It didn’t matter as long as Big Oil controls policy. Can’t fucking wait for Big Solar to displace them.
ellen.kimble@piefed.social 19 hours ago
Will nations finally see what a geopolitical risk oil is?
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Guterres also pointed out that fossil fuels still get almost nine times the government consumption subsidies as renewables.
The problem, as always, is not the technology but the politics.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 hours ago
I’ve always been supportive of solar. After all, if the Sun goes out, we got bigger problems than charging our cell phones.
I’ve had many, many people over the years tell me it’s too expensive, not efficient enough, etc., and I always said that research will fix all that, and someday it would work great, AND be economical. I never figured it would be because Trump would fuck up the energy economics of the entire planet, and solar would suddenly be the best choice.
megopie@beehaw.org 19 hours ago
I don’t think it was even a matter of research, or it least it hasn’t been for a while, more it’s a matter of scaling production and competitive supply chains.
If there are 15 steps to produce a panel and you need to make 20% profit to pay off the capital expense and cover fixed costs, then the final product is going to be expensive, if the scale is large enough to afford to only make 1% profit at every step things get cheap.
Sunshine@piefed.ca 15 hours ago
Euronews has Orban ties.
Shirasho@lemmings.world 1 day ago
Cheaper, takes up less space, and isn’t consumable, but worse because…uh…
pennomi@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You ain’t seen nothing yet
suzucappo@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
Then why is it more expensive when I opt to use renewable (including solar) energy with the electric company?
Oh wait, that’s because none of them actually want people to use it because they make less from it and/or are already so invested in fossil fuels that they don’t want to lose money on their investments so they jack up the costs intentionally to dissuade people from using it.
That’s just my opinion on the matter, I don’t have the data to back it up outside of the electric company here giving you the option to enroll in renewable energy at a higher cost.
JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 14 hours ago
Because energy companies are notoriously corrupt the world round.
Renewable energy is “new” for them, so they charge a premium because they know people will pay it even though it is cheaper and it makes them more profit.
Epstein-class garbage in charge of most energy companies.
megopie@beehaw.org 19 hours ago
But gas is also more profitable than ever for those involved. Any increase in price gets passed along to down stream consumers, but the margins have increased.
And since the people deciding what electrical generation are getting put in are not the ones paying the final bill, they have no reason to pursue solar at scale.
Some places are installing it at scale, but it’s almost always due to some public mandate, or because the people putting it in are the ones paying for the final power.
BriniaSona@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Solar can’t be owned by people and not be completely controlled by a huge company. Solar is decentralized energy and it needs to be embraced way more
jballs@sh.itjust.works 22 hours ago
Think you accidentally added an extra 't
morto@piefed.social 1 day ago
The production of solar panels and mineral can be controlled by groups. It’s not as decentralized as we think, but still better than oil, nonetheless
French75@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
As well as the permitting policies, tarriffs, and fees for grid-connected solar systems. At least where I am (California), governments and utilities have made solar much more expensive than it needs to be.