I’d be wary of importing random unintelligible registry keys from sites purporting to increase system performance for free. Even if they’re posted on social media, the land of rigorous fact checking and rationality.
Windows 11 25H2 Includes a Faster NVMe Driver Needing Manual Installation
Submitted 3 weeks ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 3 weeks ago
It mentions & includes a link to the NotebookCheck site as the source. It’s certainly NOT an unreliable site.
db2@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
laughs in Linux
spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
It certainly is, and when it breaks because it can’t handle some obscure use case, I won’t bat an eye
CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Install random shit for the promise of .0001ms seek? Jesus Christ guys 🤦♂️.
themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
I am definitely not installing this, but I thought it was an interesting article.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
jokes on you, that measurement became slower with the new driver. but if you look at the other measurements…
why is it that any of your comments are easily downvote worthy? always misleading and/or incorrect.
CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Issa exaggeration you nerd.
Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Just like Linux 20 years ago.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah, but all the Gentoo flags working together would add up to 0.004ms!
adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Interesting. I presume that over time, MS plans to tweak the driver, increasing safety and security, and then start transitioning known safe devices over. Seems surprisingly responsible.
Poach@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Only like 10 years late
CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s 2026 (basically) and Linux still has major GPU stability issues and doesn’t support HDR or vrr over HDMI units using a valve deck image.
Glass houses my man.
SavageCoconut@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Here’s a reply from an ―allegedly― ex-employee at Msft you can find in the comment section of the article:
There is a lot of confusion on this thread between NVMe Storage Controller drivers and Disk drivers, e.g. “we have always been able to replace NVMe drivers”. Previous driver releases, e.g. by Samsung, are for the NVMe Storage Controller, which you don’t see in Device Manager unless you view by connection. The inbox driver is “Standard NVM Express Controller” or stornvme.sys. Samsung’s driver was secnvme.sys.
The title of this TPU story is misleading; there is no new NVMe (controller) driver, there is a new disk layer driver nvmedisk.sys that is just an optimization of disk.sys that provides marginally better performance for NVMe drives (some SCSI command translations removed; multiple queues supported; presumably latency optimization and cache flush behavior). This is not really an “NVMe driver” because it’s not the controller driver. The disk layer driver is not super specific to a particular storage medium; this is just optimization to pair better with stornvme. It’s possible that you could force install nvmedisk.sys on HDD and it may even work, albeit unreliably and/or slowly.
Source: I worked at MS for decades. You know that checkbox in Device Manager for drives that says “Turn off Windows write-cache buffer flushing on the device”? That was me.
ascendings@fedia.io 3 weeks ago
This is actually kinda cool! Hopefully it eventually becomes a "default" of some sort or at least has an easy toggle in compatible configs.
kescusay@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hmmm. The NVMe standard has existed since 2011, and Samsung released their first commercially-available drive with it in 2013. So Microsoft has had at least 12 years to make nvmedisk.sys the standard driver for these disks.
finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Probably why it isn’t standard, especially since there’s a driver that does work even if it’s suboptimal.
deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 3 weeks ago
And obviously, there’s been no possible way to try loading the modern driver and if that fails, falling back to the legacy one.
This is once again Microsoft refusing to improve performance, because that doesn’t directly increase profits.
DokPsy@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
If only there was a way to do a check for compatibility on the os side for a standard that has been available since before the predecessor os was released and fall back to the older driver if it fails
pHr34kY@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
So they can’t just write some probe code? It really can’t be that hard to determine if there’s support.