They make laws that claim to be for everybody but are only for people who aren’t rich or powerful. The rich and powerful can commit bribery, human trafficking, murder, and more without consequence but yet jail people for doing the same thing. It’s like parents who swear all the time but punish their children for swearing.
Not all government. Government is actually really good and useful. In the hands of psychopaths and grifters it becomes an edifice to tear down because it offers protections and rules.
Anyone who says “government is the problem” fundamentally does not understand the role of government in society.
henfredemars@lemdro.id 21 hours ago
Don’t forget debt. I have to have an emergency fund but you just print money and spend it like there’s no tomorrow for years on end?
grue@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
That’s because macroeconomics actually do work differently than microeconomics. The idea that a country should be run like a household is fallacy.
henfredemars@lemdro.id 16 hours ago
Maybe, in a perverse way, they aren’t all that different in the extreme. If I were a billionaire, I can take loans out against my securities basically forever. Governments can sustain a growing debt load forever if it grows more slowly than GDP.
Alas, I am not a billionaire.
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Tell me you don’t know anything about economics without telling me you know nothing about economics.
henfredemars@lemdro.id 16 hours ago
Tbf, this post is a shower thought comparing governments to parents. Governments aren’t individuals.
AreaKode@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
A responsible company would have a 6 month emergency fund… Failure to plan ahead should not be my emergency
Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 20 hours ago
I’d argue that a responsible country should have something like a 10 year emergency fund. You never know when some natural disaster might come along and cripple a critical segment of your country’s production.
Instead they’ll just print more money and rob the poor and middle class through inflation… which drives stock prices up keeping the wealth of the wealthy fairly protected while the poors stay at the same level of income and have less proportional assets.