What the fuck is this stupid law? An actress can consent to film a nude scene, but if you share the scene she filmed for you to watch, you’ve somehow violated her moral rights?
Reddit mod jailed for sharing movie sex scenes in rare “moral rights” verdict
Submitted 1 day ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 9 hours ago
Scrollone@feddit.it 1 day ago
Damn, this is seriously fucked up and dystopian.
You shoot a movie, why cannot I share my favourite scenes with other people?
frongt@lemmy.zip 22 hours ago
Same reason you can’t turn someone’s social media photos into a porno mag for sexual gratification. It’s unethical and exploitative.
sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 hours ago
A film is wildly different from somebody’s social media posts
falseWhite@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’m just starting to realise how fucked up Denmark is.
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 21 hours ago
Right?
What the fuck, Denmark?
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Ohmagerd! Which actresses nude scenes was he sharing so I can make sure I don’t share them?
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
If you’re serious, Reddit had/has an extreme fixation for clipping scenes with Alexandra Daddario, Jennifer Lawrence, Megan Fox, Sydney Sweeney, and Ana De Armas.
They’d get posted to /r/celebs and watch it for the plot.
iii@mander.xyz 1 day ago
I’d assume they’re danish actors based on the article
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 day ago
the subreddit ThatTrueDetectiveSceneWithAlexandraDaddario was peak reddit times.
Scrollone@feddit.it 1 day ago
Yeah but this was on a Danish subreddit, focusing on Danish actresses.
I bet there was a lot of delicious content, but the sub has been banned.
offthink@lemmy.ml 15 hours ago
From the TorrentFreak article referenced by Ars Techina (torrentfreak.com/redditor-convicted-for-sharing-n…):
The prosecution successfully argued that by taking scenes out of their original artistic context and sexualizing them, the defendant violated the integrity of the actors and directors…
One scene featured actress Signe Egholm Olsen in ‘Nordkraft’
MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.
bigbabybilly@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Title had me smiling in the first half. Ngl.
iii@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Infringes reputation is so sooo broad. It comes down to who does the judge like the most, no?
jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah, it also seems weird cause things like remakes, parodies, trailers, etc. all would technically violate that law.
iii@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Someone once explained it to me.
Some poeple think the law should describe illegal behaviour. And that the law should apply the same to everyone.
But what happens in practice is that most people just want to be able to punish people they don’t like. So they don’t mind overly broad, generic laws, as in their mind it will only be used against the other.
And in practice the selective enforcement works for a long, long time, too. Untill a shift of power occurs, and now the same laws are enacted just as selectively, but directed differently. Then they surprise pikachu.
dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 22 hours ago
Except a remake would not use the original actor’s image, a trailer is part of marketing the actor agreed to, and parodies are covered by fair use.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 hours ago
Do you even know if that’s true for Denmark? It is in the US, but I doubt it is, globally.
dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 22 hours ago
Seems like this was based on the people whose images were being exploited complaining to the court, so their view of what infringes their reputation.