Let’s ban rainbows
Pressing Doubt on those numbers.
Lgbtq are the victims though 🤪
Submitted 21 hours ago by goddessluna@lemmy.sdf.org to [deleted]
https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/65586100-4f84-4a9d-a53f-e7b6abeecbc3.png
Comments
TachyonTele@piefed.social 21 hours ago
shads@lemy.lol 20 hours ago
So I have a genuine question if you don’t mind indulging me. Are you into trolling people or are the beliefs you espouse your sincerely held beliefs?
TheYojimbo@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
I looked into their post history, they just are a bad person.
Quexotic@infosec.pub 16 hours ago
Joines 1 week ago, 2 posts, this and a transphobic one. No comments. Block em.
PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 20 hours ago
Fuck you swine. Get the fuck off our instance 🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 17 hours ago
OP should be stopped.
OmegaMouse@pawb.social 17 hours ago
Annnd blocked lol
random_character_a@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Truly a shitpost, but the wrong kind
muxika@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
A shit post, in fact.
callouscomic@lemmy.zip 19 hours ago
My non-gay parents used to beat me with a belt. It was hung openly to remind me. They bragged about it to people.
Siegfried@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Troll
HikingVet@lemmy.ca 17 hours ago
Try and take my flag from mr you fuckstick.
muxika@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
They are the victims, though, like of anti-LGBTQ propoganda. You ironically disproved your point.
SuluBeddu@feddit.it 20 hours ago
Thus is based on one controversial source, an article written by a priest, to which the commission board decided to formally respond with concern, including for conflict of interest
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5567452/
There is a whole discussion.
The point of having sources is not to demonstrate a number is true, but to allow readers to see how scientific are the findings. You can read the discussion for yourself.
This poster cherrypicks a controversial article that shows the numbers the poster authors wanted, despite it being an outlier in that research space