The AI subtitles are just the worst. Always so many bad mistakes.
Submitted 4 days ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to technology@lemmy.world
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/sep/23/subtitlers-replaced-by-ai-sdh
Comments
bobslaede@feddit.dk 4 days ago
SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Jones says that linguists and subtitlers are not necessarily against AI – but at the moment, it’s making practitioners’ lives harder rather than easier. “In every industry, AI is being used to replace all the creative things that bring us joy instead of the boring, tedious tasks we hate doing,” she says.
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
The funniest part of ai subs has been it always adds cussing to kids shows and censors cusses in other clips.
Its is almost worse than nothing for me, someone that just enjoys subtitles
db2@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It has fabulous secret fucking powers.
harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Has anyone checked to see if tentacles do squelch wetly?
I mean, they kinda do in some
hentaianime.nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 days ago
Nice to see I’m not the only person whose brain immediately tried to come up with titles and genres where that subtitle could be legit.
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
Youtube’s AI generated subtitles are the worst. They’re borderline useless, I have to spend as much time trying to explain to my hard-of-hearing grandmother what the people actually said instead of the confusing grammarless gobbledygook that the subtitles said, as I would if we just had subtitles off and I had to simply tell her the words she couldn’t hear. I hate it.
Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Yep. They “see” music and applause at every corner.
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
I also find it loves to caption background noise “Heat” for some reason.
binarytobis@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Every single time I try youtube subtitles because I didn’t understand something, they end up being useless AI subtitles and I am faced with disappointment again.
I could understand how it would be helpful for the hearing impaired watching clearly-enunciated youtube videos, though. Should still hire professionals for movies.
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 days ago
The automated captions have been there for ages, and yeah, they often have a lot of mistakes especially if there are other sounds in the background.
But what sucks even more are those auto-dubbed videos, because often they are made from those subs. So now they speak in AI voices using a broken translation from a faulty transcript. Great, thanks youtube, very helpful.
Years ago, there used to be community subtitles as a feature - people could submit translations and corrections and creators could then allow them on the video. Why they removed that I don’t know, but those would be really fucking handy now that you want to auto-dub the videos eh, youtube?
captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 days ago
For those of us used to using multiple cues they can help, but they’re also often absolutely terrible
echodot@feddit.uk 4 days ago
I’m pretty sure it’s just text recognition. I don’t think it’s AI I think it’s the same garbage text recognition system they’ve had in there home hub speaker things for ages. Still infinitely better than what they’ve got in Siri.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 days ago
I see it has the same success rate and issues that the Closed Captioning system in broadcasting, which existed long before current AI solutions, has. The best way to get subtitles, is to have a hand-written .srt.
frongt@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
Most of those closed captions are, or at least were, done by humans. Even live TV.
I don’t know if it’s changed recently, but it used to be all humans with a stenotype. Professionals are very good at it.