Smartphones aren’t the issue. You can access the internet in other ways. This feels very boomer yelling at clouds.
That said, as a recommendation, sure why not. People do seem a bit too glued to their phones overall. But I don’t think that’s anything new.
I also don’t know anything about japanese laws, so I have no idea if this is a concern, but anything potentially enforcable that cuts into people’s freedom arbitrarily makes alarm bells go off in my head.
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 2 days ago
For those who didn’t read, it’s not an enforced cap. It’s a recommendation. This is essentially just a PSA framed as an ordinance.
Lembot_0004@discuss.online 2 days ago
Ok. I was already starting shouting “crazy fascists!”. I’ll postpone the shouting until they start to enforce this recommendation.
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I think that’s a very wise position. It could be testing the waters or even an attempt at setting precedent.
Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Nice, print some paper, maybe some leaflets. Pat the person that does the writing for it on the back and pay some taxes
Will surely change something, i am convinced
/s
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 2 days ago
“I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY!” -Michael Scott
nyan@lemmy.cafe 2 days ago
If it were an enforced cap, I’d be wondering who it was that had the shares in a desktop/laptop/“real computer” manufacturer—forbidding smartphones ≠ forbidding screens or Internet access.
Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Now you’re thinking with
portalscapitalism.