I’d love to hear some informed commentary on the legality of this, if it’s legal, it’s surely an oversight in the law.
UK cyber vigilantes generating mock IDs of local MPs to protest Online Safety Act
Submitted 3 weeks ago by besselj@lemmy.ca to technology@lemmy.world
https://cybernews.com/security/developer-protests-uk-age-gating-with-mock-mp-ids/
Comments
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
zonnewin@feddit.nl 3 weeks ago
Of course it’s not legal. This is called identity theft.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Using the ID, sure. But what about providing the service?
CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Given that many online services currently asking for ID have a proven track record of massive data leaks I’d argue that demanding people upload photos of their ID is complicity in identity theft too.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
It’s identity fraud, and also an offence under the Misuse of Computers Act, gaining access to a system unauthorisedly.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 weeks ago
“My OpenAI credits got hugged to death, please use a known postcode (like one from Keir Starmer’s constituency, WC2B6NH) in the meantime,” the author asks.
While the OSA is dumb, this is also bad design, and why applications are going to use so much power.
Cache the image creation results. Use a random address generator. This would drop the LLM use to the bare minimum.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
That’s…exactly what they are doing and telling you to use a known post code so you hit the cache…
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 weeks ago
They’re using ChatGPT for fake address generation if it even needs a cache for that part. There are plenty of libraries to do that locally. They should only need to cache generated images, which is the only thing a model would be useful for here.
Auth@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah this is not worth the risk. Identity fraud of a politicians can be a serious crime. The pay off for this is a minor inconvenience for some desk worker and a few slop articles written about you.
Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
It can be used by AI age verification tools on a bunch of websites. So yes I guess that is fraud. But these tools claim not to store the data in the verification process. If somebody could prove a made up ID was used then I suspect they’re in bigger shit for a GDPR leak.
aurelar@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
It’s a case of mutually assured destruction: to charge someone with impersonation, they would have to admit that they saved data that was supposed to be only for age verification and then deleted.
underline960@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Rather thanIn addition to this, they should leak all the websites that MPs are visiting.If it’s anything like the United States, we’re sure to find some embarrassing search histories (at the very least).
No privacy for me. No privacy for you.
ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Neil Parish MP: I’m resigning after porn moment of madness
MrNesser@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Well he did it love in the commons not surprised he’s going