Submitted 1 year ago by ShaggyDemiurge@lemmy.blahaj.zone to nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
This godforsaken country is introducing the bill that allows to strip people of birth-given russian citizenship for some things - like desertion and discreditation of army (which happens every time you question war)
So, my question, if someone loses all citizenship, what happens next? Is their life basically over? Is there a way to re-gain citizenship (like, in another country)? Can they be deported?
You become stateless, and it’s a legal nightmare. Most countries won’t deport you, because they have nowhere to deport you to. But some countries like Australia will detain you until you get citizenship elsewhere. Sort of a catch-22, where you need to apply for citizenship to get out of prison, but can’t because no country wants to grant you citizenship because you’re in prison. The act of being stateless in itself isn’t a crime, but living somewhere without a visa is, and some countries (like Australia) don’t automatically grant visas to stateless people without some other reason like a refugee application.
Prior to the 60’s, it used to be much more common, because most countries use a legal concept called Jus Sanguinis, which basically means that citizenship gets passed from parents to children via birth. America, on the other hand, uses something called Jus Soli, which grants citizenship based on you being born in the country. But if the parents aren’t eligible to pass their citizenship on and the country they’re in doesn’t practice Jus Soli, then the child would be stateless. Back in the 60’s, most Jus Sanguinis countries agreed at a convention to provide emergency citizenship to individuals who would otherwise be born stateless.
These days, the largest causes are typically financial/records keeping issues in third world countries, or are due to politics like you’re describing. In the former, imagine a Jus Sanguinis country where you need to prove who your parents are. But they don’t have copies of their birth certificates or your birth certificate, and you don’t have money to get new ones. There’s also an administrative fee when you try to file the paperwork, and you can’t afford it. In the latter, it’s often due to certain ethnic groups being denied citizenship (like the Uyghur Muslims in China,) or due to authoritarian governments stripping citizenship for arbitrary reasons like you’re mentioned.
America, on the other hand, uses something called Jus Soli, which grants citizenship based on you being born in the country.
I would clarify this from "America" to "most of the New World".
Dude this is sick! I’ve grown up my whole life in the US and never realized how many other countries do this. Wikipedia has an incredible map: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli
Asia and the Pacific - 1.582 million registered Africa - 715,089 registered Europe - 570,534 registered Middle East and North Africa - 372,461 registered Americas - 2,460 registered
These are really interesting numbers, I wonder if it has to do with immigration policies
A lot of it has to do with racism and not allowing full citizenship rights to minority groups.
That was a good read
Wait, you are trans and in Russia? That seems like reason enough to flee, I wouldn‘t wait until they become aware enough of you to strip your citizenship. Maybe Finland would be ok: https://en.seta.fi/human-rights-support/asylum-for-the-lgbt-and-activists/
Good luck, I hope you will be safe.
You should still be able to apply for refugee, asylum, permanent residency, or citizenship in other places. Whether or not that’s realustica and feasible is another issue, but legally, you’re fine: Your citizenship status at home won’t affect your ability to seek a new home.
I suspect the best bet at the moment would be trying to ask Finland for asylum, since they’re not allied with Russia. Getting within their territory might be challenging, though, as I suspect they’ll require identification and/or outright block Russians from entering. Also, I have no idea how to proceed once within a different country. Maybe one of the baltic states might also work?
or outright block Russians from entering
If you’ve been stripped of citizenship for opposing the war, are you still Russian?
Obviously that’s semantics, and what matters will be whether Finland still considers you Russian, but I think it would be in their benefit to allow entry to former Russians who are explicitly opposed to Russia’s bullshit
I bet even if they tried to deport you, they wouldn’t know where to, since you technically don’t have a home counrty
Russia is not part of the UN convention that forbids making a person stateless, but I don’t think that would have mattered anyway.
As a stateless person, you can seek asylum in almost any European country.
You can get Brazilian citizenship if you are statelessness, here’s an article about it . Iirc, you can do this from anywhere on the world, but doing it from inside brazillian territory would make it easier.
What happens is that you become a stateless person, just like the Palestinians once where. I can’t speak for Russian law.
That’s still true for a lot of druze I the Golan heights, and while it doesn’t have a drastic effect on their daily lives, traveling abroad is an absolute nightmare
God, I honestly hope they revoke mine. Come what may, I don’t think the general opinion about Russians will change any time soon.
Once I can get citizenship in another country, I’m gonna publically burn my russian passport - but not earlier
I’d advise against it if purely for ease of life in your new home country. Some, like UK require you to still have dealings with your previous country.
For example if i want to change my surname to my wifes name, home office demanded that i change the surname in my original passport first. They even say that if you need to physically go to your country of origin to do so, you have to unless they will kill you (for example persecution of LGBT). But i donno what kind of proof they would need to support this claim.
I have a strong suspicion that “burned my passport as a statement” would not qualify, even if it means supporting a terrorist state with cash (because consular services are paid by cash) in 3rd world countries.
This is a webpage from a guy who voluntarily because stateless. identityunknown.org/…/Introduction_A_series_of_li…
If your home country revokes your rights as a citizen, I would imagine that it gives you justification to claim refugee status with the UN.
You'll want to read up on Shamima Begum. She's currently stateless right now. Here's another article from Time if you want more information.
What happens is The Terminal, staring Tom Hanks :P
Why should life be over?
There are just some rights that you don’t have anymore. Some duties, too.
Uhhh afaik stateless persons generally live in prisons or airports
International human rights organizations
Maybe be comw a fugitive and leave
I mean, in Russia, anything is possible, but in any country that respects the rule of law, you're a citizen if you pay taxes.
There are tons of people (legally) working and paying taxes in the US and aren’t citizens. I get what you mean, but…
As a citizen of the US, it's not like we entirely respect rule-of-law. We're all too happy to overlook enforcing laws against rich/famous/corporate, and all too happy to overlook legal protections for poor/immigrants/minorities.
I don't know if that's true anywhere, but it's not true in either of the country's I've lived in.
Not a citizen but a resident.
They did not want to think it through for they didn’t cared.
solivine@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I honestly don’t know, I remember someone got trapped at an airport once because their country stopped existing while they were there
ma11en@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Tom Hanks made a documentary about it.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Are you talking about The Terminal? Unless he made a second movie about the same guy, the word"documentary" seems like a stretch.
SomethingBurger@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is so infuriating. The country didn’t disappear overnight. The land is still there, they could have sent hum back. Even if the country was nuked to ashes, they could just accept him as a political refugee.
PopularUsername@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It was someone suffering from a mental illness or personality disorder. They went out of their way to be stuck at the airport. Refused help from family, refused help from a reporter who actually went through the trouble of proving his citizenship. He wanted to be at that airport and live that life.