is there is any Lemmy server that care about privacy(does not require email), Does not impose limits on community posts like my current instance and does not have high amount of restrictions?

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Pro@reddthat.com⁩ to ⁨fediverse@lemmy.world⁩

I want to be part of the solution of the problems I see on Lemmy, that is why I opened my alt account at my current server to open new communities while fixing their issues.

I had been informed by the server admin that I should not post more than 5 posts in 9ne community which is guaranteed to kill my communities on my current server.

I am explaining the backstory here for people to understand my logic for my question.

So, I really appreciate any help here. If anyone can give me good servers to open my communities in.

My current communities:

News: to lower the load on Lemmy. World server and to improve the Fediverse health. -Europe: due to less than optimal moderation actions as documented in "power trippin " community.
Misinformation/ Disinformation: Because there is no community to post research and news about this topic.

Thank you all for your help. I really would appreciate any lead here.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Dubiousx99@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
It sounds like you are looking for a server that is ripe for bot abuse. What time frame did the admin say not more than 5 posts. I would tend to think they mean 5 posts a day which sounds completely reasonable to be for an upper limit on posts per day into a single sub.

source
- Pro@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Yes, The time frame is per day.
  
  Here is the reason I don’t support that limit:
  
  From my experience in moderating the technology community at my main account, no one will post on my new community for very very long time.
  
  How will news community for example survive on 5 news posts daily? As I said it will be granted to fail if it did not contain useful news posts that cover wide amount of topics.
  
  source
  - Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Plenty of communities survive with 5 posts per user daily
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - Evkob@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    You don’t need 5 posts a day for a community to survive here. There’s not that many people on Lemmy, things are a bit slower paced.
    
    I mod !bicycles@lemmy.ca and we’d be lucky to have one post per day, yet I think it’s still a relatively healthy community, with a decent amount of engagement on most posts.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - PlasticExistence@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    I don’t dislike the Adam’s Family nor the Munsters, but I have blocked both communities because they each had a ton of submissions on the same day, and they were dominating my feed.
    
    There’s nothing wrong with slowly submitting content. Submitting too much, too quickly makes it hard to distinguish from spam.
    
    Just my opinion. I understand that you are looking to build something, and therefore you probably disagree on submission frequency.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
jordanlund@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Lets say you find an instance that meets your requirements, given the lack of email validation, what’s going to happen is that instance will be host to trolls and spammers, top to bottom, and then it will get defederated from the rest of lemmy.

source
- ada@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  It's entirely possible to host an instance that doesn't require emails to sign up. Blahaj lemmy and piefed don't for example. We don't have a spam problem though, because we require manual approvals of new accounts. Lack of email verification is only a problem when it's combined with open signup
  
  source
- rglullis@communick.news ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  My instance does not require email validation and so far I have zero spammers or bots. There is one thing I am doing different than everyone else. Can you guess what it is?
  
  source
  - nimisnimi@lemmy.ca ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Why wouldn’t you present your solution without the theatricals?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    I would venture that you spun it up yourself.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
nokturne213@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Guessing you want a free speech instance where you can spam and spout nonsense. You may want to look to hilariouschaos, or one of the other freeze peach patriot instances.

source
- rglullis@communick.news ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  I’ve noticed you tend to always assume the worst before every trying to give the benefit of the doubt.
  
  There are very legitimate reasons to not want to give your email to any random website that asks. They can be hacked, the instance might be a front for some data aggregator, etc. And if your response is “just use a masking service” or “just use a disposable email address”, then what is the point of validating the email address in the first place?
  
  Admins add email verification because this is one extra layer of protection against automated bots, but this is far from a guarantee they are protected. It might help them to give some paper trail in case someone does something nasty on their servers, but the best they can do is take an (easy to create) email address and report to the authorities along with the IP address.
  
  Compare with an instance that only accepts paying members:
  
  no bot or spammer will be interested in paying a few dollars per month to send messages
  
  if some spammer is stupid enough to sign up to the service and sends clear spam, then we point the ToS to them, kick them out and they will be left without any money
  
  we have a much stronger paper trail in case some user does something nasty.
  
  source
  - reattach@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    I think your approach is a good one to ensure real users, reduce spam, and for the admins to be compensated for the service they provide. However, is giving your credit card or bank transfer information to a website less risky or more privacy-focused (one of OP’s goals) than giving an email address?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Set up your own server and apply your own rules.

source
- scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Agreed, this is my go to response to everyone, (seriously there’s like a post a week about this same thing) asking it. Sounds like the perfect place to spread whatever garbage you want is the server you set up and pay for yourself, accepting all personal liability for. Go all cowboy with it!
  
  source
remon@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Just use a disposable one-time mail?

source
gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Huh, maybe db0?

source
- db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  We require a valid email for registration as an anti-spam measure, but you can remove the email afterwards.
  
  source
  - tisktisk@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    What does garble mean in this context? What would be accomplished by removing your email after registration?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
  - gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Oh right, the email!
    
    source
- Pro@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  db0 require email for registration.
  
  source
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
Email is optional on lemmy.sdf.org.

source
njm1314@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
I don’t see how required an email means they don’t care about privacy.

source
- sexyskinnybitch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  I agree. If you’re worried about it, set up a free gmail account to use for validation, problem solved.
  
  source
  - Angry_Autist@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    You mean those free email accounts that actively scrape your emails for data?
    
    Is everybody here just on crazy pills today?
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- Angry_Autist@lemmy.world ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  Then you don’t understand privacy
  
  source
FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
!fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com

source
rglullis@communick.news ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
communick.news fits all you requirements regarding users - only paying members can join, so the instance is pretty much guaranteed to be protected from spammers and bots.

Regarding your communities: I really rather keep a strict separation between “instances for communities” and “instances for groups”. The topic-specific instances I am running are meant for specific niches, but perhaps I can find one domain that can be used for more “generic” subjects. Would you be interested in that?

source
technohippie@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
slrpnk.net doesn’t require an email, and as far as I know it doesn’t have the restrictions you mention.

source
- FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Which is great until I lost my password 😂 @FundMECFS@slrpnk.net will sit empty forever I guess.
  
  source
  - FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Actually @poVoq@slrpnk.net was wondering if possible to recover my account since it’s pretty obviously my alt. If not possible, no worries, totally understand.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
Sendpicsofsandwiches@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Sh.itjust.works didn’t require email when I made my account, but I couldn’t say for sure if that’s still the case

source