Dubiousx99
@Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
- Comment on VPN server on router or within home network? 3 weeks ago:
A jump host is just a system that serves as an exit point into the restricted network. You can do this with Ubuntu desktop but you need to figure out how you are going to jump into your host. Others have mentioned tail scale and head scale as options for doing this. Tailscale would be an example of an agent based adhoc vpn solution; this would place a dependency on an external provider to host a connection broker service and use an agent that periodically checks into the broker service for connection requests. Headscale would be the self hosted option and you would need to forward a port into your network and you should guard it with a reverse proxy.
- Comment on VPN server on router or within home network? 3 weeks ago:
Good point about network availability and endpoints.
- Comment on VPN server on router or within home network? 3 weeks ago:
Since I have no patience, I’ll lay out some items for consideration.
1st, I wouldn’t rely on an ISP router to serve as my end point for a VPN. They likely have access to manage that device and it likely isn’t getting any updated. You are better off implementing it with your own equipment that you keep updated.
If you have a capable security device serving as your router to the external internet and you want full access to your internal network, then you might consider using a VPN that terminates at your router.
I myself am a fan of setting up a jump host and initiating a VPN connection directly to that host when using an agent based solution. Then you can monitor the host for activities, more easily keep your edge device patched, and then use the capabilities of your jump host to interact with the rest of your network. This would require either an agent to periodically poll a platform for connection requests or another form of ingress into your network.
- Comment on VPN server on router or within home network? 3 weeks ago:
Expand on your use case. Why/what do want to access on your local network when you are not there?
- Comment on is there is any Lemmy server that care about privacy(does not require email), Does not impose limits on community posts like my current instance and does not have high amount of restrictions? 3 weeks ago:
Omg, I agree. I hate seeing the same article posted to 10 different instances all lined up in a row.
- Comment on is there is any Lemmy server that care about privacy(does not require email), Does not impose limits on community posts like my current instance and does not have high amount of restrictions? 3 weeks ago:
More than 5 posts would raise the likelihood of people blocking that instance because of spam. Less is more.
- Comment on is there is any Lemmy server that care about privacy(does not require email), Does not impose limits on community posts like my current instance and does not have high amount of restrictions? 3 weeks ago:
It sounds like you are looking for a server that is ripe for bot abuse. What time frame did the admin say not more than 5 posts. I would tend to think they mean 5 posts a day which sounds completely reasonable to be for an upper limit on posts per day into a single sub.
- Comment on YSK about Jury Nullification, if you're an American and you don't, look it up. 4 months ago:
Let me clarify, I disagree that people should not be informed about jury nullification. Too many people forget that we grant our government power. One way we continue to enforce that power grant is by reserving the right to a trial by a jury of your peers. Too many people take that message to heart that they need to rule in accordance with the law.
- Comment on YSK about Jury Nullification, if you're an American and you don't, look it up. 4 months ago:
I disagree, we also want people to nullify laws that are unjust, such as prosecuting a woman who decides to have an abortion. This is one of the means the people retain to fight tyranny.
- Comment on San Francisco Goes DOGE: Mayor Demands Employees Show Up to Work 4 months ago:
“Improve foot traffic…”
- Comment on DOGE uncovers over 4M government credit cards responsible for 90M transactions 4 months ago:
That’s 22 charges per card. Seems reasonable, hard to quantify without knowing over what period and where the charges took place.
- Comment on NY Times Op-ed: Jack Smith Abused Power, Interfering in Election 8 months ago:
What a load of BS. Just because it is in a newspaper doesn’t mean it is news. I find the opinion piece uses dubious logic to try and argue its case.
- Comment on Amazon tech workers leaving for other jobs in response to return to office mandate 9 months ago:
Thank you both for a positive example of challenging someone’s post.