She looks really young to be the wife of Adolf Hitler. Bathing in the blood of 100 virgins must really keep your skin looking young.
United Nazis
Submitted 10 months ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/6ad91db3-acd1-4b77-8353-7b4b6c38c24e.png
Comments
isekaihero@ani.social 10 months ago
MoondropLight@thelemmy.club 10 months ago
Sadly she’s probably one of the more moderate Germans from the last government. Germany as a whole, learned the most narrow lesson from the Holocaust and Munich Olympics; which, you would think would be “Genocide bad”, but is actually “Israel good”.
At least Baerbock has acknowledged the suffering and declared that “Palestine belongs to Palestinians”. That’s such a low bar but the majority of Germans don’t clear that. It’s very sad, but what can you do?
For so long anything critical has been labelled antisemitic and sometimes also made illegal. The first news org in Germany to do Israel-gov critical reporting would end up in court and might lose it’s license.
geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Nonsense. She was one of the most fierce repressers of protests and deniers of genocide. If this woman would face trials like Nuremberg she would be executed.
MoondropLight@thelemmy.club 10 months ago
I don’t follow German politics that closely, so I’ve probably missed something, but how was Baerbock involved in suppressing protests as Foreign Minister?
Her comments at the start of the genocide should be enough for her to lose her position in government. It is really sickening and sad. But when it comes to German politicians, I don’t know any that are better.
fenpy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Cunt!
loomy@lemy.lol 10 months ago
Not 100% of everything is about the war in Gaza
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 months ago
But the genocide is the only reason anyone is defending her in this thread.
PanArab@lemm.ee 10 months ago
But you wouldn’t want a genocide enabler in such a high position.
loomy@lemy.lol 10 months ago
I personally, would like it if no one killed anyone ever.
raltoid@lemmy.world 10 months ago
That is true, but she is an open defender of their actions. And has complained multiple times when UN tried calling them out.
loomy@lemy.lol 10 months ago
ok, but what about all the other wars happening on earth right now?
ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Does it make you a war criminal if you simply agree with war crimes that others have committed?
Bit of a wide reach to call her a war criminal, no matter if you agree or disagree with her position.
vala@lemmy.world 10 months ago
IMO I does if you are in a position of power like this.
geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Does it make you a war criminal if you actively defend the people committing war crimes while helping to send them weapons?
Soulg@ani.social 10 months ago
Actively defend them? No it doesn’t.
Sending weapons? At the very least you’re an accessory to it, so I’d agree with that.
Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Does it make you a war criminal if you simply agree with war crimes that others have committed?
Jesus, dude. Listen to yourself.
Spzi@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I agree that Hitler should have been assassinated. Therefore, I am as much of a hero as those who tried.
Noodle07@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The assassination attempts failed, does that make you a failure ? 🤔
dohpaz42@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the agreement with war crimes make you a sympathizer? The act of being a sympathizer is deplorable, but not illegal. I feel like a lot of people take their name-calling to the extremes these days.
ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Exactly my point but I guess I need to “listen to myself”.
SupraMario@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Nuance left the building a long time ago.
Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 10 months ago
If Joe Bloggs next door agrees with war crimes, he’s just an arsehole.
If the head of the United Nations General Assembly agrees with war crimes, I think there’s a case to be made…
bstix@feddit.dk 10 months ago
Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
However, persecution is an international crime against humanity, so if someone wanted to, they could make a case against her at the International Crime Court.
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 10 months ago
If you enable it, maybe, kinda. Something close at least.
Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
It is still considered complicity in violating humanitarian law.
deathbird@mander.xyz 10 months ago
“German Foreign Minister profers an invalid defense of a rogue nation’s killing of civilians” to “she is a war criminal herself” to “Nazinazinazi”.