Sea snail teeth top Kevlar, titanium as world’s strongest material
Submitted 1 week ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
Comments
Dasus@lemmy.world 1 week ago
lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 week ago
The mineral in question (goethite - yup, named after the poet Goethe) is iron III oxide and hydroxide. It’s 5~5.5 hardness in the Mohs scale, so it’s softer than glass. The snail teeth is probably combining the goethite strains with proteins to make it so hard. I wonder if we couldn’t sub the proteins with kevlar or another para-aramid to create something similar.
jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
Queue extinction of snails
deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Cue
jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 1 week ago
nuh-uh! see they’re in line to be extincted
_druid@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Sounds like a good opportunity for anyone who has ever wanted to be a snail farmer.
lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 week ago
Napstablook spreading the word about his family business.
not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Space elevator when?
9point6@lemmy.world 1 week ago
What does this tell us of the teeth that your average escargot enjoyer has?
LordGimp@lemm.ee 1 week ago
I’m real tired of “strongest material” being thrown around. As a welder turned machinist, “strong” doesn’t mean much of anything to me. Aluminum is plenty “strong” but it’s softer than some woods. Tungsten carbide is harder than a coffin nail but you can chip it by looking at it funny sometimes. Kevlar is plenty tough, but it isn’t hard or particularly flexible. There isn’t any super material that will ever do all the things “the best” and throwing around meaningless titles for clickbait feels childish at best and exploitative at worst.
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
You’re forgetting that “strength” has a formalized engineering definition, which is the amout of force (not energy or impact) a material can resist before deforming or breaking.
The other 2 properties you’re alluding to are hardness (force needed per unit of deformation) and toughness (energy absorbed before deforming or breaking. All of these are important factors when choosing materials for a particular use case.
The article is comparing the material to kevlar and spider silk, which suggests that they’re referring to tensile strength, which is a proper use case. It isn’t the paper’s fault that your are incorrectly conflating “strongest” with “best”. What’s best for any particular use case is going to be dependent on design requirements.
LordGimp@lemm.ee 1 week ago
And you’re forgetting that the chumps making these engineering definitions are chump engineers who think they’re making parts in a theoretical plane of existence where only their numbers matter.
In reality, everything should be made out of copper nickel superalloys because man that shit is cool af. Frfr if you ever get a chance to mess with aluminum copper nickel you should do it because that shit is borderline mystical.
DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 1 week ago
Obviously you’ve never heard of flex tape