CEOs when an AI agent ($5/hour) can't output the work of five highly qualified human workers (250$/hour)

Comments

• Kurious84@eviltoast.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  From my experience ChatGPT can handle the job of all upper management far easier than your average worker.

  source

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    In my experience, most workers would do at least as good a job in upper management, but the reverse is not true at all.

    source

    • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      In my experience a lot of workers start doing a really shit job once they get told they have the slightest bit of authority over other people. Sadly that does not mean they would be worse than other upper management.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • random_character_a@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Yes. My upper management also hallucinates, confabulates and makes up pointless shit task, in sake of having new tasks.

    People would however notice, because AI wouldn’t throw occasional ego tantrums.

    source

    • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      and the meetings about meetings

      source
• psycho_driver@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  The $5/hr AI can probably out-produce CEOs though.

  source

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Prediction markets have been proven more effective than CEOs for decades. The economic system we have today isn’t optimizing for efficiency - it’s optimizing for control. Even if the CEOs are just using AI themselves, we’re more likely to obey an order from a human middleman than we are from an AI directly.

    TL;DR: CEOs are Gaius Baltar

    source

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      The role of CEO might actually be one of the most fitting for AI. In a co-operative business model, where employees collectively own the company. An AI could serve as the neutral, data-driven decision-maker. Instead of relying on a single human executive who may be influenced by ego, bias, or personal gain, an AI could analyze performance metrics, market trends, and employee feedback to guide the company strategically. It wouldn’t replace people, but it could coordinate them efficiently, minimizing politics and maximizing long-term success. It’s not about removing humans from leadership, but rather redefining leadership as a shared, optimized process.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • velummortis@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Not exactly a high bar there…

    source
• Pinklink@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  If a job wanted to pay me $50/hr, I would actually try.

  source

  • meliaesc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I get paid that much, and sure as hell respect the people making less, because they work so much harder than me, when I’m just sitting at a desk in zoom calls, occasionally getting to write a little code.

    source
• MeThisGuy@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  is your username the male equivalent of tigolbitties?

  source

  • pugehenis@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    i dont know what your talking about its after my pug ehenis

    source
  • Enzy@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Males have breasts too.

    Some are also big.

    source

    • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      touché

      (as I like to do with breasts)

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Who decreased the frame rate of the gif?

  source

  • teije9@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    I did. also are some of the pixels. was hungry, sorry

    source

    • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      It actually seems like that issue came from loading the gif itself.

      Remember that GIF is lossless and barely has inter-frame compression.

      source

      • -> View More Comments