Number 6
Submitted 1 week ago by noxfortuna@lemm.ee to [deleted]
https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/019f322a-ad1a-4695-a902-37cf62072ebf.jpeg
Comments
But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 1 week ago
apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That’s got real Cinco Face Time Party Snoozer vibes.
AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 1 week ago
Thanks for coming.
Enkrod@feddit.org 1 week ago
Sure why not
not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 1 week ago
1 looks like Stand Up Mathematician Matt Parker wearing normal glasses.
Heavybell@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Gorilla glasses. Those are what protect my phone screen from damage, right?
jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
How do number go
Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Cigarette dude because I like to look cool af
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 1 week ago
3 is like, “why you all looking left?”
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Who the hell numbers like that?
noxfortuna@lemm.ee 1 week ago
People getting interrupted from meme-smithing by having to answer questions at work. Or maybe I was trying to be smart and write it boustrophedon style 🫠
Wolf314159@startrek.website 6 days ago
How is a zig-zag numbering any less valid than any other method? Your mapping a two dimensional space with what is essentially a line. Sometimes it doesn’t make sense for there to be discontinuities in the numbering, as one would have to do if the numbers always incremented in the same direction. Would you prefer that the numbers follow the path of a Hilbert Curve?
To answer your question though, surveyors have been using this method to number sections of land for much longer than you or I have been alive.