Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

China launches HDMI and DisplayPort alternative — GPMI boasts up to 192 Gbps bandwidth, 480W power delivery

⁨402⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨schizoidman@lemm.ee⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.world⁩

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/china-launches-hdmi-and-displayport-alternative-gpmi-boasts-up-to-192-gbps-bandwidth-480w-power-delivery

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Dojan@pawb.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Is it an open standard?

    source
    • glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      To quote the article:

      a Type-B that seems to have a proprietary connector and a Type-C that is compatible with the USB-C standard.

      So its half proprietary. No thanks!

      source
      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Half-owned by a Chinese company is wholly owned by the CCP

        source
    • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Most important question

      source
  • flemtone@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Why not use the already open displayPort and make it better.

    source
    • glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      noo we need yet another standard!

      source
      • bfg9k@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Image

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Lock-in.

      source
    • nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Displayport is an open standard in name only. The specs require membership in VESA, something that requires a hefty sum of money. Even open-source projects have to restrict code that implements Displayport because of the licensing restrictions imposed on the “open” standard.

      source
  • drspod@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    This must be for commercial displays where it is beneficial for installation to have power and data over a single cable.

    I can’t think why I would want power delivery to my PC monitor over the display cable. It would just put extra thermal load on the GPU.

    source
    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I think it’s aimed at TVs in general, not computer monitors. Many people mount their TVs to the wall, and having a single cable to run hidden in the wall would be awesome.

      source
      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I wonder what the use case is for 480W though. Gigantic 80" screens generally draw something like 120W. If you’re going bigger than that, I would think the mounting/installation would require enough hardware and labor that running out a normal outlet/receptacle would be trivial.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Even in that scenario it will complicate the setup. Now your Roku will also have to also power your TV? No, any sane setup will have a separate power cable for the TV.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        In wall power cables need to be rated for it to prevent fire risks. This will need to have thick insulation or be made of a fire resistant material.

        source
    • amorpheus@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It would just put extra thermal load on the GPU.

      Passing power through doesn’t have to put noticeable load on the GPU. The main problem I see there is getting even more power to the GPU - Nvidia’s top cards are already at the melting point for their power connector.

      source
      • drspod@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Passing power through doesn’t have to put noticeable load on the GPU.

        I specifically said thermal load. Power delivery always causes heat dissipation due to I^2^R losses.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • DuskyRo@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Nah, it’s for powering the 1000w RTX 6090.

      source
    • PeachMan@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      The popular use for power delivery through a display cable is charging a laptop from your monitor; it’s already very common with Thunderbolt or USB-4 monitors. But 480W seems a bit overkill for that.

      source
    • jaxxed@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Why is that better than usb-c?

      source
    • Sizing2673@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That already kinda allow this and the actual load is pretty small

      Even a big 30 in display is maybe 20 watts

      Well, power delivery goes several times that. Laptops are another very useful case for it. It’s nice to be able to just have a single display port and power connector

      You can do this to an extent, today

      source
  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Relevant xkcd

    source
  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Today I learned DidplayPort 2.1 can carry 240W.

    source
    • kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That’s a lot of power! Are there even any devices that use this?

      source
      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        PCs can use >1KW.

        I don’t know why you’d power a PC over DisplayPort though. New 8k monitors do go up to 190W, so we could exceed 240W if we try hard enough.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Monitors, although I’m not sure I want my PC PSU powering those as well as everything else.

        source
    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      They fixed it.

      source
  • Funwayguy@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Running that much power next to a data line sounds like a terrible idea for signal integrity, especially if something shorts to said data lines. It just sounds sketchy or filled with so many asterisks that it’s functional impossible to reach their claimed throughput.

    source
    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It’s likely dc current which without the alternating magnetic fields will not degrade the signal as bad. But I whole heartedly agree with you on power delivery. What could possibly need/use that much power‽

      source
      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The option to run one cable to the monitor, or reversely charge your laptop with one docking cable.

        Maybe you could use this to daisy chain monitors and power them all.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Bigass showroom screens I suppose?

        source
      • FiskFisk33@startrek.website ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        its super nice to plug a laptop into a screen and have the cable double as a charging cable for the laptop

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • amorpheus@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      USB standard is up to what, 40Gbps and 240W? That’s pushing the envelope already. We’ll see if this new standard can prove itself, anyways.

      source
      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        USB4v2 can do 80Gbps and 240W.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      See, IDK anything about data and power and cables but I dislike the vibe when I dock my laptop with that itty bitty USB-C connector that does power and 2x monitors and networking and peripherals.

      I did buy the bonkers expensive proper cable from lenovo, and it does generally just work, but maybe once every few weeks I have to unplug & re-plug.

      More power and more data through the same cable just seems daft.

      source
  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Loved automobiles with 4 wheels? Chinese cars have 13! In your face suckers!

    source
  • UltraBlack@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Not really that impressive since it seems to be about four times as wide as USB-C

    source
    • princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      So is HDMI? Smaller connectors aren’t always better, and it’s not like it’s SCART size or something.

      source
  • pennomi@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Even an 80” tv only uses around 150W, if my research is correct. Surely this must be thinking about massive displays.

    source
    • cannedtuna@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      If you’re gonna release a new standard, may as well have the headroom for future growth so it’s not outdated too soon in the future.

      source
    • Anivia@feddit.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Your research would be incorrect

      source
      • pennomi@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Yeah it was a quick google search. Do you have better numbers available?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • IllNess@infosec.pub ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Now you can use one cable for two 80".

      source
  • Burghler@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Won’t this heat up like a mother fucker

    source
    • avidamoeba@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It depends on the voltage used. If they run 48V which seems to be supported by USB EPR. Then the cable has to do the same 5A it’s capable of doing today. Then the heat is the same.

      source
  • Reverendender@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If it’s physically more stable and reliable than HDMI, then count me in

    source
  • vane@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    If it’s not usb-c it’s banned in EU. Because we stopped there and we won’t go forward.

    source
    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      the GPMI cable comes in two flavors — a Type-B that seems to have a proprietary connector and a Type-C that is compatible with the USB-C standard

      I actually copied this from the article to come here to the comments and have a whinge about all the different USB-C standards, and here you are explaining the reason why.

      source
      • rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The whole point of USB-C is that it’s a standardised connector that allows anyone to shoehorn their own protocol down it if they want using Alt Mode. Moreover, they can do that without breaking compatibility with other USB-C - or even just specific features - if one of the devices doesn’t speak their crazy-ass moon protocols. This is a benefit of USB-C, not a failing.

        source
      • vane@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Don’t get so excited. Read my comment again.

        source
    • rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      In case anyone is wondering, yes, this is utter nonsense. The EU made USB-C mandatory only as a charger for portable devices like phones, tablets, headphones and mice. That’s all. This new standard, unwelcome as it is, has nothing to do with charging phones so there’s no reason why it can’t be used in the EU.

      But let’s not allow measley facts get in the way of having a moan at nothing, shall we? Fucking EU. Forcing us to [checks notes] chanre all out things using a single connector, reducing e-waste, and, uh, ensuring there’s lots of futureproofing built-in. BASTARDS.

      source
    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Please don’t make stuff up.

      Other stuff isn’t banned and the law already has allowances for emerging standards.

      source
    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I think you could have a second connector in addition to a main USBC.

      Honestly we need higher capacity for screen cables for PC. Both HDMI and display port are limiting performance because of their low, 40-80gbps, bandwidth. Their performance maxes out at 4k120hz with uncompressed HDR color. You can’t use 8k screens or multiple 4k screens without lowering quality.

      source
      • ceiphas@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Where I work, everyone has 2 4k screens. You can use two cables to connect them, you know…

        And every one of them has either put their scaling up to 150% or simply set them to 2k, because you cannot read a damn thing on them.

        More than 4k is a theoretical need for a veeeery small market

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • NeonKnight52@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Actually? I don’t know much about that legislation. Does it really not have room built-in for tech improvements?

      source
      • Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        It does! If there’s a good alternative it can be proposed, or that’s what I read here on Lemmy

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    We already have alternative, it’s called thunderbolt port.

    source
    • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      No, we don’t. Apple proprietary nonsense isn’t worth the metal it’s made of.

      source
      • bilb@lem.monster ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        I usually associate it more with Intel since they certify Thunderbolt devices on all the non-Apple hardware and that’s all I use. I forgot Apple had anything to do with it.

        source
  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Power delivery by itself could be a useful standard for ebike and power station charging (battery to battery charging too). 480w is most I’ve seen, but maybe USB is working on better, or 240w and more flexible/cheaper cables can work. HDMI providing 54v output would be great for most common battery system charging, and dual/triple BMSs for 2x and 3x ports/charging would be awesome.

    source