so musk will be investigated over how he runs xitter, right?
FTC investigates “tech censorship,” says it’s un-American and may be illegal
Submitted 1 day ago by Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 day ago
adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
He’s already investigated himself and found that Xitter is a bastion of freedom. Same goes for Truth Social.
Asafum@feddit.nl 1 day ago
Compelled speech it is then?
So when are bakers going to be forced to bake cakes for gay couples?
Oh, right, hypocrites. Naturally.
reiterationstation@lemm.ee 5 hours ago
Do as I say not as I do is power of no one stops you.
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Reveling in their hypocrisy won’t save anything.
They don’t care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.
Asafum@feddit.nl 23 hours ago
It slightly saves my sanity. Only slightly though.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
For them, them being able to be hypocrites is a “cool thing”
tal@lemmy.today 20 hours ago
If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.
daddy32@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
It’s not censorship, it’s “censorship”. You know, like banning nazis, calls for harming women etc.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Generally speaking, when a much stronger party forces upon you a mechanism, it doesn’t work in your favor. Whether they call it free speech (for bot campaigns too, while you get banned) or moderation (your opponent insults you in every comment, and they are fine, but you insult them once - you’re banned).
The super weirdest thing is that people again and again believe that the strong party belonging to “their” side will do things right this time in history.
sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 9 hours ago
I doubt it. They could just sensor based on location.
techforwhat@lemmy.today 13 hours ago
It should be interesting to see how it plays out, indeed.
I don’t expect the US will entirely ban all forms of content moderation. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US moved more in the direction of the EU Digital Services Act: required transparency on recommendation algorithms and some sort of NGO trusted flagger system.
Also, similar (but opposite) to Splinternet: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brussels_effect
sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 23 hours ago
When they say tech censorship they mean people should be allowed to be racist
francisco_1844@discuss.online 11 hours ago
And post as much disinformation as they want without “censorship”.
beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 21 hours ago
And by “free speech”, we mean you have to publish what we tell you.
Sturgist@lemmy.ca 14 hours ago
IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 hours ago
Good thing we have a fair and balanced FTC? Right?
Lets see:
We have 2 Democrats 2 Republicans, and…
oh… one vacant seat 👀
(also, one of the Democrats was appointed in 2018, we all know who was president then)
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 23 hours ago
Hey government how’s it going
…
…
Jesus fucking christ
ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I know the point of this is probably just intimidation but 35 companies? Are there 35 social networks that moderate content? Why is Apple included? Is there some conspiracy theory that they’re censoring conservative App Store reviews?
Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Defunded in 3…2…
bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Tomorrow: Trump installs loyalist with zero qualifications as head of FCC.
vonbaronhans@midwest.social 40 minutes ago
You misunderstand. This IS Trump’s chosen stooge. FTC Chairman Carr.
He’s complaining about tech companies “censoring” conservatives for “speaking their minds”, aka being hateful bigots and spreading misinformation during a public health crisis.
skepller@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Yeah, I wonder how long until Elmo arrives to “make the FTC more efficient” lmao
Tronn4@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
We need fELONs crack team from X -said no one