I had asked it to compare him and Hitler using only historical evidence and no conspiracies, it didn’t have new info so I fed it an article explaining the executive orders and it kept talking about it like a fictional scenario.
First, telling people about an interaction with an AI is like telling them about that weird dream you had, nobody really cares.
Second, any AI has a training cutoff date, meaning they don’t know about any event that happened after they were created.
Finally, do you think you’re saying something here that hasn’t been said a thousand times over already?
Death_Equity@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Isn’t most LLMs trained on older data? So it thinks you are talking about the last election
halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
This is true. But it also is stating that it knows Trump did not win a second term, insinuating it has data past the election.
There needs to be a lot more transparency in what the models are actually based on and what is being artificially filtered or limited.
otto@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
He didn’t win a second term in 2020. The data is clearly from around then.
kabi@lemm.ee 8 hours ago
I mean his presidency is a month old, and his election win is still just three months old, whereas his loss is four years old. That is a pretty significant difference. In the current AI craze 4+ year old stuff is ancient, while a ~3 month old model is not terribly out of date yet (other than current world events, obviously).