Let him go!!

Comments

• psycho_driver@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  How can we know the over-arching theme and conclusion of this paper without seeing it in it’s entirety?

  source

  • uservoid1@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    You can read it here www.scs.stanford.edu/~dm/home/papers/remove.pdf

    source

    • lemming@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      And how did it end? Was it published? Did they get off the fucking mailing list? Wikipedia doesn’t say.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • blackbrook@mander.xyz ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’ll never know because there was no TLDR.

    source
• cRazi_man@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  The pro-tip no one told me before my publication: make a secondary email/alias to use for your publication because the spam will never stop.

  source
• SquirrelX@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  This and the chicken presentation are my favourite pieces of academic pieces of work youtu.be/yL_-1d9OSdk

  source

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Chicken chicken chicken chicken. Chicken?

    source
  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That’s fucking brilliant

    source
  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Really some insightful questions from the audience too.

    source
• IndiBrony@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Get

  your

  ing

  ing

  source
• badelf@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Did you buy this article from Springer for $19.99?

  source
• HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I feel that after all the shit from Academia.edu and Research Gate

  source
• mvirts@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  This is a work of art

  source
• propter_hog@hexbear.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Anybody got a ref to the original publication?

  source