Comment on Sony is killing off recordable Blu-ray, bidding farewell to disc burning | TechSpot
0x0@programming.dev 2 months ago
We must cut all options for the end user to own anything, let’em pay subscriptions instead.
In a SONY board meeting, probably.
Eh, I doubt many people are burning their own Blu-ray discs - this does not apply to discs you buy that already have films on, they are manufactured differently, and are still being made.
But even if you do archive your personal data onto Blu-ray discs, there are still other manufacturers besides Sony.
This really isn’t a big deal.
This really isn’t a big deal.
Sure. One tiny bit at a time…
Really though, who burns Blu rays. Yes I’m sure there’s a handful of people out there doing it but I don’t know anyone who’s still burning discs in 2024. Storage space is large and cheap now and way less hassle than discs. Companies as big as Sony can’t keep producing products for a tiny market it just doesn’t make sense.
Yup. I use a NAS to not have to deal with disks. I’d rather buy a couple more drives than have to store even more stuff at home.
Who still burns discs (outside of retro gamers) in 2024, let alone Blu-Rays? They aren’t killing the whole format.
What does a movie company not producing movies on discs have to do with ending production of rewrite-able discs?
Nah, probably just didn’t sell enough, with USB sticks around.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone use the format. CDR saw a lot of use, but who needs bluray nowadays?
I believe they’ve said that this doesn’t change their production of non-rewritable Blu-rays.
Do you have a source for this? That was my worry tbh.
Just did a quick search and found this headline on a site that I’ve never heard of before. Unfortunately, I forgot where I initially read it, lol
Different divisions. This is more akin to when Sony decided to stop making floppy disks. The market is there for now, but it’s just not worth it from a financial perspective.
The amount of people burning their own blu rays is minimal. Even the type of people who emphasize owning their own content just use a NAS system.
This is more akin to when Sony decided to stop making floppy disks. The market is there for now, but it’s just not worth it from a financial perspective.
Ironically Japan is just now phasing out floppies, so there’ll still be a market for a while.
A NAS is mostly geared for online media storage, whereas disks are for offline.
That’s just the government though, similar to how a lot of the systems in the US still run on COBOL (including the IRS).
Ironically those who own their own NAS and hoarding data are amongst the more likely to be burning their own Blu-rays
I mean sure, but Jellyfin and HDDs exist, and are much more convenient than burning a Blu-ray that you have to put in a drive to watch.
Optical disks tend to be used for offline archival storage more than movies (IIRC they’ll still be printing out Blu-Ray movies, just not blanks).
This is not as big a deal as you think. Blu-Ray production itself isn’t ending, they just aren’t making any more recordable Blu-Rays. Most people aren’t going to be burning stuff to Blu-Rays. You’ll still be able to buy Blu-Rays if you want a physical copy of a film.
new_guy@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Why are we suddenly selling more NAS grade HDDs?
Seagate executives
Infynis@midwest.social 2 months ago
I got mine in November
FinalRemix@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Recommendations?
ag10n@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’ve put together a RAID 1 of these and some 860 Evo QLC Hard to say if they’ll last as long as BD but you can’t beat the capacity
visiontek.com/…/visiontek-tlc-7mm-2-5-ssd-sata-en…
samsung.com/…/ssd-860-evo-2-5--sata-iii-500gb-mz-…
glimse@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Something tells me the market for media servers is very different than the market for BD-R. The only benefit to having a collection of burned discs over a NAS is that you can let people borrow them. It’s otherwise mostly downsides
lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 months ago
If they were cheaper I’d use them for archival purposes. They work well as cold storage.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Are we back to trusting Seagate again? Last I knew their spinning rust was t trust worthy. I’ve had 6 drives fail me in the last 2 decades, and all but one or two were Seagate, so I just assume their bad anymore and go with other suppliers.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Every drive I’ve had fail, personally or professionally, has been a Seagate drive.
TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Every drive I’ve had failed was WD. My Seagates have been mostly fine
pikmeir@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’ve had both Seagate and WD drives fail. I just think drives fail rather commonly.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Seagate does seem to have a higher failure rate, but they are also cheaper. From this article:
Their oldest drives are Seagate as well, so that’s saying something.
Whether a drive will be reliable for you is less related to the manufacturer and more related to capacity and luck.
Here’s an anecdote from Reddit:
But this could also be luck, idk. My takeaway is:
new_guy@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I genuinely don’t know. Their name was just the first one that came to my mind.