Now I want that image of the dog framed and hanging in my house.
Voices can’t be protected by copyright but there may be a legal avenue for someone like Morgan Freeman to sue if a voice is clearly a knock off of his voice AND he can make a case for it damaging his “brand”.
I’d be impressed though if AI can write a novel without directly referencing a fictional person, place or thing that someone else made up. Stable Diffusion, for example, can make a picture of dog wearing a tracksuit running on the side of a skyscraper made of pudding in the middle of a noodle hurricane. But it didn’t invent any of those individual components, it just combined them.
rdyoung@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Plopp@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Jesus, that’s dark.
Agrivar@lemmy.world 8 months ago
“Now I want that of the dog framed and hanging in my house.”
Are ya sure your brain didn’t skip a few more words?
;-P
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 8 months ago
This is why we need laws for likeness rights. Every person should own exclusive commercial rights to their own face, voice, etc.
Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 8 months ago
What about when a talented comedian speaks in the voice of someone else? Should we just write a law that humans are allowed to do it, but machines aren’t?
nintendiator@feddit.cl 8 months ago
Tell me you don’t understand the difference between human creative work and “”“AI”“” work without telling me you don’t understand the difference between human creative work and “”“AI”“” work
afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I don’t. What exactly is the difference between me making a remix of someone’s voice using software I don’t understand and me telling software I don’t understand to doing that slightly more?
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 months ago
There is no difference. My work involves tools, be they hammers or ML models.