Elon “Daddy Warbucks” Musk.
Comment on Russia is using SpaceX’s Starlink satellite devices in Ukraine, sources say
echo64@lemmy.world 9 months agoI’m confused. Do you think starlink is free to access? You have to have authentication to use it, spacex is allowing russia to use it.
Gregorech@lemmy.world 9 months ago
tsonfeir@lemm.ee 9 months ago
All he needs is a flying suit.
Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 9 months ago
Of course starlink is allowing paying customers to use it, won’t someone think of the shareholders!
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 9 months ago
spacex is allowing russia to use it
Bold claim to suggest they would be defying US sanctions to Russia. Got anything to back that up? Not even the article that you didn’t read implies that.
gmtom@lemmy.world 9 months ago
Bold claim to suggest they would be defying US sanctions to Russia like that
I’m no diplomat but I’m pretty sure this doesn’t break any laws.
And if you know anything about Musk then it’s really not a bold claim.
locuester@lemmy.zip 9 months ago
But you clearly didn’t read the article. This makes having dialog in the comments frustrating.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 9 months ago
It’s against US sanctions. Starlink doesn’t work in Russia (or Crimea) for this very reason.
“If SpaceX obtains knowledge that a Starlink terminal is being used by a sanctioned or unauthorized party, we investigate the claim and take actions to deactivate the terminal if confirmed.”
jonne@infosec.pub 9 months ago
Yeah, it’s totally impossible for Russia to register these using an Ukrainian VPN with Ukrainian ID. It’s not like they have access to tons of POWs or even Ukrainians that are sympathetic to Russia.
echo64@lemmy.world 9 months ago
So now you think that it’s… Ukrainian traitors or pows? You think they don’t deactivate clearance for anyone captured?
If you’re going to make up fan fiction for Russia, at least suggest something more realistic, like espionage
jonne@infosec.pub 9 months ago
Is registration only limited to military personnel? My guess is that anyone except citizens of sanctioned countries can register one of those, so you just need any kind of foreign ID, which are probably plentiful if you have access to POWs or the population of Donbass.
con_fig@programming.dev 9 months ago
You don’t own the sky, nasa does!
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
I’m curious, how do you think starling can tell the difference between a Ukrainian and a Russian?
Are you under the impression that Russia is signing up for service transparently? The devices aren’t sold in Russia, and won’t even work within Russia. Meaning they were likely bought through a proxy using aliases, and set up in Ukraine.
At that point, you cant tell the difference. It’s just data, which can also be easily encrypted and proxied to mask the fact that they are being used for military purposes.
rdri@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It’s not though. The data goes both ways. As long as the device id was not altered, its history of movement can be tracked down, provided such a data is being recorded.
Also, there may be caveats about how accounts are getting created and activated. Those devices bought by Russia may come with pre-activated accounts which can be tracked by origin.
Finally, billing. Unless Russia is not relying on stolen Ukrainian credit cards it should be easy to identify that a group of devices/accounts are being paid for by entities that are neither Russian nor Ukrainian.
Based on all of that, they could filter groups of devices by location, confirm it with Ukrainian forces and ban maliciously used ones.
UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Yeah. Russia crosses many lines but stealing credit cards is NOT one of them
rdri@lemmy.world 9 months ago
What do you mean? They steal basically everything they when destroying cities and killing people. Should I mention it’s a crime to make it more obvious?
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
Russia has operatives worldwide. Just like every other country with any sort of intelligence agency. The idea that they aren’t able to come up with a credit card with a Ukrainian name that looks 100% legitimate to a billing company is farcical.
Let me just ask you point blank, do you think the CIA could manage to purchase a Starlink, activate it, and use it, without anyone having any idea it was the CIA that did all that? Because if so, it’s just as easy for Russia to do it.
Hell, I could likely do it.
gardylou@lemmy.world 9 months ago
rdri@lemmy.world 9 months ago
I see you don’t know how credit card numbers work. You may also not be aware of the fact that credit cards aren’t working in Russia for almost 2 years.
Just one or two is easy to manage. A dozen is much more difficult already, provided Starlink manages some security and have access to metadata (data that ultimately can’t be faked such as location, accounts, device id).
LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 9 months ago
This is kinda scary. Sanctions are one thing, but do you really want your internet provider to investigate people and act like an intelligence service for the state?
rdri@lemmy.world 9 months ago
It’s not about what I want. It’s about what Starlink can do to make sure their help to Ukrainian army (which is paid by the US department of defense) goes only to Ukrainian army.
KrapKake@lemmy.world 9 months ago
You see, you are supposed to have a “musk bad” comment, not a rational comment.