Comment on Would magically turning all trans people into the gender they want to be be unethical?
leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 months ago
I mean, doing anything to anybody without either their knowledge or permission is about as unethical as it gets.
testfactor@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Out of curiosity, would you feel the same if the question was, “If I could snap my fingers and cure everybody on earth who has a terminal illness, would it be unethical to do so?”
Like, you would be modifying their body without their consent. On the other hand, you’re literally curing people with terminal illnesses. Seems churlish of them to complain.
Cyv_@kbin.social 5 months ago
The difference would be the phrasing and specifics. "Magically switch trans people to the assigned sex at birth that they desire to be?" Works for some. "Magically make trans people's bodies align with their specific and nuanced gender identity" is less of an issue. The problem you run into with the first is some are not interested in surgeries or are non binary so a full surprise sex swap would not be what some trans people want.
I still think consent is important though, even if the way the magic works is basically "they get what they want". As much as it is hard to imagine, there are also trans people who do not want to transition at all due to having family or friends who would cut them off (I think that's a pretty awful and tragic situation to be in, but imagine the trans woman who magically changes to the shock and anger of her deeply religious family or SO, who then ostracize or reject her, or even react violently). You aren't likely to be murdered for recovering from cancer, but in some places magically shifting assigned sex might come with some pretty awful, bigoted strings attached
Justas@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
Some excellent points, thank you.
deegeese@sopuli.xyz 5 months ago
I’d be mad if you cured Trump’s syphilis or Putin’s Parkinson’s.
ivanafterall@kbin.social 5 months ago
To be fair, we don't know for sure it's syphilis. It could also be leprosy, for example.
DessertStorms@kbin.social 5 months ago
Some people are at peace with dying, and probably most terminally ill people have lived long full lives. If they already know they're dying they're likely to have made their final arrangements and said everything they needed to say and are accepting of death, a completely natural thing.
You personally assuming that you would want to be magically "saved" without any prior knowledge or consent doesn't mean everyone else feels the same.
leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 months ago
So you tell them, preferably ask them, first. That’s why surgeons make you sign consent forms.
BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
Surgery has risks, magic in this case does not.
KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 5 months ago
If you modify the thought experiment slightly, it becomes an interesting trolley problem.
Let’s assume the spell you’re using is all or nothing - either it cures everyone, or no one. What if some subset of people explicitly do not consent? How many people would it have to be, or what percentage, before you would consider not doing it? Obviously if only 1 person doesn’t want it, who cares, greater good, but what if it was 99% of people? Where’s the line?
leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 months ago
But its still not your decision to make. Would 100% of people use it? Probably. What do you lose by asking them first?