Comment on AI content on Wikipedia - found via a simple ISBN checksum calculator (39C3)
Saapas@piefed.zip 22 hours agoWhat’s the irony?
Comment on AI content on Wikipedia - found via a simple ISBN checksum calculator (39C3)
Saapas@piefed.zip 22 hours agoWhat’s the irony?
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
He used AI to write the anti-AI tool
lauha@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
To be fair, humans are excellent at building anti-human tools
TheBat@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
jballs@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
Heads up he talks about this specifically at 26:30 for those who didn’t take the time to watch the video.
Saapas@piefed.zip 22 hours ago
But wasn’t the issue with the AI stuff that it was false info, whereas the tool sounds like it worked as intended?
d00ery@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Here’s the explanation from an LLM ;)
Image
Saapas@piefed.zip 21 hours ago
It just seems like the tool he is using is working though…
bossjack@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
I think the point is it would have been truly ironic if the AI itself was the authoritative fact checker instead of merely being a tool that built another tool.
If Claude was the fact checking tool instead of the ISBN validator, that’s the real irony.
If in a messed up future, only an AI could catch a fellow AI, what’s stopping the AI collective from returning false negatives? Who watches the watchers?
bytesonbike@discuss.online 15 hours ago
Which is kinda my favorite thing to do as of late, and what I prefer AI be used for.
I’m not taking about building a suite of black box tools. But tiny scripts to scrape, shape, and generate reports. Things I used to pull in a dozen node libraries to do and manually configure and patch up.
You know, busy work.