Comment on AI content on Wikipedia - found via a simple ISBN checksum calculator (39C3)
ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
TL;DW:
He wrote checksum verifier for ISBN and discovered AI generated content on Wikipedia with hallucinated sources. He used Claude to write the checksum verifier and the irony is not lost on him. He tracked down those who submitted the fake articles and determined many are doing so out of a misplaced desire to help, without an understanding of the limitations and pitfalls of using LLM gen content without verification.
Saapas@piefed.zip 1 day ago
What’s the irony?
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 day ago
He used AI to write the anti-AI tool
lauha@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
To be fair, humans are excellent at building anti-human tools
TheBat@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
jballs@sh.itjust.works 18 hours ago
Heads up he talks about this specifically at 26:30 for those who didn’t take the time to watch the video.
Saapas@piefed.zip 1 day ago
But wasn’t the issue with the AI stuff that it was false info, whereas the tool sounds like it worked as intended?
d00ery@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Here’s the explanation from an LLM ;)
Image
bossjack@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
I think the point is it would have been truly ironic if the AI itself was the authoritative fact checker instead of merely being a tool that built another tool.
If Claude was the fact checking tool instead of the ISBN validator, that’s the real irony.
If in a messed up future, only an AI could catch a fellow AI, what’s stopping the AI collective from returning false negatives? Who watches the watchers?
bytesonbike@discuss.online 17 hours ago
Which is kinda my favorite thing to do as of late, and what I prefer AI be used for.
I’m not taking about building a suite of black box tools. But tiny scripts to scrape, shape, and generate reports. Things I used to pull in a dozen node libraries to do and manually configure and patch up.
You know, busy work.