It very well could be true, but the dev also seemed full of shit in the first interview I saw, pretending that he had no clue why it was banned.
Comment on the game "Horses" now barred on Steam, Epic and Humble Bundle
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 17 hours agoUnless it unexpectedly sells gangbusters, the dev says they’re likely to shut down as not having the massive steam audience to sell to won’t net them enough to continue. And people are stupidly loyal to valve for some reason.
markz@suppo.fi 17 hours ago
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
I mean, he released the communication he’s received. It’s not super clear. And the things he thinks it was isn’t even in the current version of the game
KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
The response said “no CSAM”.
If they had to scratch their heads trying to figure out what parts of the game needed to change to not include allusions to that, then they have bigger problems than not releasing on Steam.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 hours ago
They did change the one scene where that could have even conceivably applied. It wasn’t actually that to begin with, either.
yermaw@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
They’d be as well carrying on. Its in a pretty unique position as being a game that people are talking about before its even finished, which is pretty uncommon for most titles, and can be “the game they tried to ban” which did wonders for Manhunt, GTA and Postal.
cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 16 hours ago
Valve is pretty upfront about being a business first and foremost. Their customers are loyal because they consistently provide high value at reasonable prices, even though they are in a dominating position in the market. They’ve taken unpopular decisions in the past, but never any that seriously alienated a meaningful chunk of their customer base.
Maestro@fedia.io 17 hours ago
That's because Valve is privately owned and this has largely resisted the enshittification that largely plagues public companies and private equity frims.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
Except people give them passes for shit that they don’t extend to other companies. The blind loyalty is stupid
Zorque@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Such as? Perhaps if you specified on what they’re getting a pass for people could be a little less blind.