Broadly it might not be worthy of condemnation, but in the context of “child appropriate” it would seem to be way less appropriate than what he is complaining about.
Comment on From Snoop Dogg to Lap Dogg
Karjalan@lemmy.world 12 hours agoWhile his take here is shitty, I think doing drugs and having sex with women for money is not something that warrants out right condemnation imo.
His involvement in murder and assault, and the sexual assault and battery accusations are much more damming and legit reasons to shit on him though.
jj4211@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
I think Snoop is being a dumbass here (like I did when he went to Trump’s inauguration party) but this is a bad argument. He didn’t make the music for young children.
lime@feddit.nu 12 hours ago
it’s not condemnation, it’s pointing out hypocrisy.
yermaw@sh.itjust.works 9 hours ago
If I had to choose between explaining how 2 women have a baby and explaining what “pimpin’ a ho” and “187 on an undercover cop” means, I know what I’d prefer.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 hours ago
But there’s nothing wrong with fucking or doing drigs, and the perspn ‘pointing out hypocrisy’ didn’t mention that hes a rapist
MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I don’t know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in as extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.
lime@feddit.nu 5 hours ago
the man has financed and produced lesbian pornos. i don’t think it’s that broad.
outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 hours ago
Okay but nobody said that. They said ‘how dare somebody who likes drugs and has done sex work hate someobe marginalized!’