Comment on UwU brat mathematician behavior

Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  As an engineer I fully agree. Engineers¹ aren’t even able to do basic arithmetics. I even cannot count to 10.

  ¹ Except maybe Electrical engineers. They seem to be quite smart.

  source

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Engineer here, I can definitely count to 10 tho

    0 1 10

    source

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      0 1 everything that comes after is simply summarizes as “many”

      source
  • gnutrino@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Electrical engineers are the ones that use j though (because i is used for current)

    source

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I am used for current

      source
  • thomasloven@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    10? That’s the name some put to 1e1, right?

    source
  • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Except maybe Electrical engineers.

    Yup, I can count just fine to 10: black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, gray, white.

    source

    • alt_xa_23@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      xkcd.com/227/

      source
  • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    The inner machinations of an electrical engineer is too complicated for me to understand, I think they might be thinking on a higher order to understand these circuits

    Thats why I barely passed my electrical engineering class lol

    source
  • Fedizen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Having worked with electrical engineers, some of them are quite smart, the rest have lead poisoning.

    source
• Hoimo@ani.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  How do we know it’s gay though? OP could be a girl (male)

  source

  • SippyCup@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Because it’s 4chan. And there are no women on the Internet on 4chan

    source
  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Sure OP is a girl. Guy In Real Life

    source
  • ByteJunk@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Newfag.

    (sorry! seemed like the appropriate 4chan reply)

    source
• TheSlad@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Right? They got that shit backwards. Op is a fraud. i is used in pure math, j is used in engineering.

  source

  • Chakravanti@monero.town ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    That’s hilarious. You’re not seeing what’s going on backwards just like that (as I point at the point going nowhere shitty) in an equation that is finding as many clAEver ways to say something you actually not caring about talking about.

    That’s like, "How many time van express the only thing that van’t be done until the 'verse itself tries to do what can’t be done and sever your…

    …Oh, I see…you don’t have ([of course, because you can’t have to give {is}) nothing)] to give.

    Unable to sea time doesn’t mean we can’t see(k)ER the mAETh.ac(k).cc(k).08

    The only thin(g):(k) that doesn’t ever be never, is not at alla hack(g)in(g).G your lackthereof to divi…

    source
• kogasa@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  The mathematician also used “operative” instead of, uh, something else, and “associative” instead of “commutative”

  source

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    “operative” instead of, uh, something else

    I think they meant “operand”. As in, in the way dy/dx can sometimes be treated as a fraction and dx treated as a value.

    source

    • Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I think you mean operator. The operand is the target of an operator.

      source

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        The operand is the target of an operator

        Correct. Thus, dx is an operand. It’s a thing by which you multiply the rest of the equation (or, in the case of dy/dx, by which you divide the dy).

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  My thoughts exactly lol

  source