Chrobin
@Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de
- Comment on Thoughts?? 2 weeks ago:
Also related, I had a psychology teacher with a PhD in psychology. But because in German schools, you need to teach two subjects (with the exception of the arts), he also taught physics. He was a terrible physics teacher, but a pretty good psychology one.
- Comment on UwU brat mathematician behavior 2 weeks ago:
I do understand it differently, but I don’t think I misunderstood. I think what they meant is the physicist notation I’m (as a physicist) all too familiar with:
∫ f(x) dx = ∫ dx f(x)
In this case, because f(x) is the operand and ∫ dx the operator, it’s still uniquely defined.
- Comment on Thoughts?? 2 weeks ago:
That reminds me of a story my bachelor’s supervisor in astrophysics told me: One of his best PhDs applied at an insurance company. They got an Excel sheet with data that they had 1 week to analyze. All the other applicants took the whole week. He just put it in Python, solved it in a few hours, and got the job.
- Comment on UwU brat mathematician behavior 2 weeks ago:
I’d say the $\int dx$ is the operator and the integrand is the operand.
- Comment on UwU brat mathematician behavior 2 weeks ago:
I think you mean operator. The operand is the target of an operator.
- Comment on But I am mighty!! 4 weeks ago:
There’s no fire in the sun. Fire is some material oxidizing, and that’s not what’s happening (or at least not in relevant amounts). What creates the radiation is nuclear fusion.
- Comment on See something you like? 5 months ago:
But don’t spread the bird flu pls.
- Comment on Hmmmm 9 months ago:
The only field where it’s actually justified: math. In math, every time has an exact definition behind it, and you have to use the exact term.