How is it eugenics if it has nothing to do with a parent’s genetic make up? Like if they said “meat eaters shouldn’t have kids” you could try and make an argument for eugenics but for nobody to have a kid or for everyone equally to have less children how is that eugenics?
i regard all antinatalism as ecofascism. i’m not asking you to change my mind, i’m letting you know you might be participating in a eugenics campaign.
BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
you are saying this in english, to a (self-)selected demographic subset of english speakers. you are encouraging a particular set of people not to have children. that’s eugenics. unless you can find a way to convey this message to everyone, at once, in an identical message given cultural and other contexts, you will be biasing the message to be more effective among some segment of the populous.
RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
We’ve done it. We’ve finally found the Olympic Gold Medalist for Mental Gymnastics.
Congratulations.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
this is a thought-terminating cliche. what i said is true.
BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
So are you interpreting the comment as only people who speak English should not have kids?
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
only people who speak english can read that comment. they are only talking to english-literate people.
AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Sorry buddy, that isn’t how this works. Great try tho. Go back to the whiteboard and come back when you have valuable input to share.
jj4211@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That’s one pair of philosophies that creep me out both ways. Both the anti natalists and pro natalists.
Deciding for yourself is one thing, imposing your choice on others is maddening.
I don’t know if the comment quite raises to the level of anti natalist though. Maybe it’s grading on a curve of reading some more hard core anti natalists, but that comment felt tame and felt like they wouldn’t necessarily object to a couple having one child or even two, being somewhat below the replacement level…
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
i’m not pro-natalist, but i am anti-anti-natalist, if there is any room for that.
Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
What a fantastically apt username
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
in, as much as possible, a non-confrontational way, i’d love to hear why you think that.
chunes@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
ecofascism is a real phenomenon. there is a cure for political illiteracy.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
i’m not talking about people who don’t have kids. i’m talking about people who advocate for people not to have kids.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
maybe not in and of itself, but any advocacy for it or policies enforcing endorsing or causing it surely are.
HailSeitan@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
2 truths and a lie…the deep ecology movement and the Unabomber would seem to undermine your third claim
Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago