In the age of AI deepfakes, I don’t even think that’s conclusive enough.
Comment on Why 3D-Printing an Untraceable Ghost Gun Is Easier Than Ever (Podcast 18mins)
venusaur@lemmy.world 1 month agoHow do you mean? You 3D print something with no serial and it’s untraceable. Even if they find it they can’t definitively say your firearm shot the bullets. Unless of course you’re on video doing it and admit to it.
iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
gotta count how many fingers it took to pull the trigger
venusaur@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Haha it’s better than that now. You have to see them eating.
toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
never forget will smith spaghetti
venusaur@lemmy.world 1 month ago
For real
RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 1 month ago
really easy to tell if an image is AI or not still it’s not that good yet
taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Unless of course you’re on video doing it and admit to it.
Something tells me not doing that part is going to be harder for a significant portion of today’s population than getting a weapon.
venusaur@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s true
just_another_person@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Didn’t Luigi get caught with the weapon in his backpack? The title picture on this article is literally him. If it’s untraceable by printing, it seems you’d want to not have it on you if apprehended.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Factually, they searched his bag when they arrested him, put the bag in a police vehicle, drove for some time, then searched his bag again off bodycam, and that’s when they “found” the ghost gun in his bag, which, without a serial number, is conveniently impossible to prove it was not planted.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 month ago
Funny that they never deny the gun was his, just that the search was unconstitutional.
elephantium@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Almost like the lawyer thinks “they didn’t follow procedure” is an easier legal argument than “the police dept is trying to frame my client”.
theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 month ago
There’s no reason to deny invalid evidence
joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Common plan for professional hitman is to drop the gun at or near the scene. With a ghost gun what could tgey trace back
venusaur@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah but they have video of him too. Idk the case well enough but I assume the gun itself wasn’t enough to prove he did it.
seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
Except for all the metal parts they used a debit card/paypal to buy.
magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
The only regulated parts (I know of) are:
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
Autosears themselves are not actually regulated. It’s the action of fully automatic fire that is. Which is kind of ridiculous because it’s not terribly uncommon to have a gun do it by accident on worn out parts.
peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 month ago
Wild. I suppose, thinking about it, it’s also way quicker to iterate on, test, and improve too.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 month ago
The components are traceable either. They don’t have serial numbers on them. Typically only the lower receiver does. This is why that’s the part that’s typically 3D-printed.
joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Those would hard to teace and yu can pay cash. How many stores sell metal pipe withthe same inner diameter as a 45 caliber. It would be lole tracing meth lab by ammonia sales.
ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Depends. He used a printed glock, not an FGC2.0. The FGC uses parts like you describe but printed glocks just take glock parts.
That said, it’s still fairly trivial to acquire those glock parts anonymously.
venusaur@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah, you can’t easily print an entire gun, but the parts you buy don’t necessarily tie you to the gun.
shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Which is obviously why you buy them with Monero instead.