By free speech absolutist he really meant he thinks fascists should be able to say whatever they want.
Comment on It's real. Twitter Shadowbanning is back.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So originally, it was that he was a “free speech absolutist,” then it was that he was in favor of free speech “within the bounds of the law,” and now he’s not even in favor of that.
psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 year ago
billiam0202@lemmy.world 1 year ago
By free speech absolutist he really meant he thinks fascists should be able to force you to listen to them say whatever they want.
JasSmith@kbin.social 1 year ago
"Down with fascism! No more free political speech!"
retrieval4558@mander.xyz 1 year ago
Non sequitur
DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 year ago
No, he’s a free speech absolutist!
Aka
A fuckin liar who would piss himself to death if people actually told him what they think about him.
woshang@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
This is blatant advertisement. Doesn’t it violate the instance rules?
Jat620DH27@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“No one can act as a moderator to remove my content” This claim does align with with the principle of freedom of speech, but we have to admit that for now, complete freedom without any control can be unsafe. It could potentially lead to spams and political issues. However, the feature of not asking for phone numbers or email addresses sounds interesting, especially considering Elon is planning to introduce government ID verification.
Sed@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Thx
pmarcilus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
Freedom for me but not for thee
MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean freedom of speech, not reach describes one boundary of the law in that nobody is required to give you a platform as far as i know.
However it does absolutely not fit to the free speech absolutism purported last year.
iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 1 year ago
You gotta be really stupid to believe people like him. They are all the same. It’s like a mental sickness. You can feel it even just hearing him talk on TV.
Jat620DH27@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I guess it’s all about his political ambition.
anlumo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
He never was, that was just an excuse to amplify the voice of his far-right buddies.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I know. It was more about what he said.
Stern@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Freedom of (my) speech.
captain_oni@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I wish I was free from his speech, specifically.
Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I don’t believe this because it gives Elon Musk too much credit and honestly I think he’s just a big loser who will latch on to whoever likes him at the time.
A series of stupid events led to Twitter being full of stupid far right nutjobs and stupid Elon decided they’re his people now because they use his stupid platform.
anlumo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m not so sure about that. The big tell is that whenever a far-right user complained to him about getting a tweet removed or the account getting banned or something like that, he’d respond that he’ll personally take care of it. Just imagine, a billionare running a platform with millions of users personally taking care of a single one. This never happened with other people.
Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
I personally haven’t heard of this, but if it’s true it’s probably just because he’s latched on to them like I was saying. He didn’t buy Twitter with some nefarious intent to unblock far right accounts, he bought it because he’s an idiot who got into a pissing match on social media. He even tried to get out of the sale claiming “bots” and the owners threatened to sue the shit out of him.
triclops6@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
This seems more accurate somehow