Being fired for any or no reason is at will employment.
Right to work has nothing to do with that. It’s about allowing people to not pay union dues. Those people are still protected by the union contract.
Comment on Will Republicans try another Federal Right to Work attempt?
LethalSmack@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoRight to work is: A right to be fired at any point for any reason or no reason at all
The goal is to get around any union protections that require things like a legitimate reason to be fired from a job.
It also has the added bonus of drastically reducing the benefits of unions and making them much easier to prevent.
Being fired for any or no reason is at will employment.
Right to work has nothing to do with that. It’s about allowing people to not pay union dues. Those people are still protected by the union contract.
You’re right. I updated the comment
You’re conflating “at will employment” with “right to work” laws.
You’re right. I updated the comment
The way I try to remember it is that it comes from the employers perspective:
Dagrothus@reddthat.com 3 weeks ago
I love how we name laws that really mean the exact opposite of what their name implies. Very american.
eezeebee@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
Land of the free
DisguisedJoker@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Image