This is why he moved to Texas
Comment on X adds Twitch to its advertising boycott lawsuit
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is insane, there should be fines for frivolous lawsuits like this.
mipadaitu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
ryper@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
And changed the twitter ToS to require suits in a specific part of texas.
Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
How likely is that chunk to be thrown out for being obviously ridiculous?
skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
In a past life, pretty plausible.
Now that Elmo is the First Lady, this is the best TOS that’s ever been written by anyone ever. It’s perfect. It probably trumps the constitution because of how perfect it is.
ryper@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
According to the article, not that likely:
Terms requiring users to sue in specific courts are usually enforceable, Vanderbilt Law School Professor Brian Fitzpatrick told Ars today. “There might be an argument that there was no consent to the new terms, but if you have to click on something at some point acknowledging you read the new terms, consent will probably be found,” he told us in an email.
A user attempting to sue X in a different state or district probably wouldn’t get very far. “If a suit was filed in the wrong court, it would be dismissed (if filed in state court) or transferred (if filed in federal court),” Fitzpatrick said.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Amazing how terms of service apparently carry the same weight as laws, yet can be changed arbitrarily by businesses on a whim.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
It also wouldn’t fly in the EU anyway.
Any lawsuits have to be brought in the country in which the citizen bringing the suit lives. So if I wanted to sue Twitter I literally would have to do them where I live. There was no way for me to sue them in Texas since I’m not a citizen I’ll be the Texas or the US.
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 year ago
There are. In most states.
He’s having the suits filed specifically in one of the few states that don’t.