Who is Frankie Hawkes?
Comment on Clever, clever
ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
My college workflow was to copy the prompt and then “paste without formatting” in Word and leave that copy of the prompt at the top while I worked, I would absolutely have fallen for this. :P
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 months ago
uis@lemm.ee 2 months ago
Professor: “Even my dog has higher h-index than you”
CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’ll do you one better, why is Frankie Hawkes.
dumbass@leminal.space 2 months ago
Its never how is Frankie Hawkes!
underscore_@sopuli.xyz 2 months ago
Judging by the response from ChatGPT they probably see themselves as some sort of literary critic?
Frankie Hawkes’ more recent critiques of Romeo and Juliet reflect an intriguing blend of literary analysis with insights derived from machine learning advancements. Hawkes has argued that the play’s weather motifs function almost algorithmically, influencing characters’ actions in a manner akin to predictive patterns.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Wow hope you lose the degree at some point.
BatmanAoD@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Wot? They didn’t say they cheated, they said they kept a copy of the prompt at the top of their document while working.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Any use of an LLM in understanding any subject or create any medium, be it papers or artwork, results in intellectual failure, as far as I’m concerned.
a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
there is no LLM involved in ryven’s post:
- open assignment
- select text
- copy text
- create text-i-will-turn-in.doc
- paste text without formatting
- work in this document, scrolling up to look at the assignment again
- fall for the “trap” and search like an idiot for anything relevant to assingment + frankie hawkes, since no formatting
MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You’re a fucking moron and probably a child. They’re telling a story from long before there were public LLMs.
juliebean@lemm.ee 2 months ago
they didn’t say they used any kind of LLM though? they literally just kept a copy of the assignment (in plain text) to reference. did you use an LLM to try to understand their comment? lol
psud@aussie.zone 2 months ago
There are workflows using LLMs that seem fair to me, for example
- using an LLM to produce a draft, then
- Editing and correcting the LLM draft
- Finding real references and replacing the hallucinated ones
- Correcting LLM style to your style
That seems like more work than doing it properly, but it avoids some of the sticking points of the proper process
CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
I mean, if your instructions were to quote some random name which does not exist, maybe you would ask your professor and he’d tell you not to pay attention to that part
Hirom@beehaw.org 2 months ago
A simple tweak may solve that: