Redjard
@Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on 90s band alignment chart 1 week ago:
Only ones I’ve ever heard are Radiohead and Rage against the Machine, sincerely, genZ.
Anyway are yall telling me there are no bands that are both horny and angry? - Comment on Always applies 75% of the time 5 weeks ago:
Seems centered on books not papers
- Comment on Google Chrome disables uBlock Origin for some in Manifest v3 rollout 1 month ago:
That’s not a webview, it’s a separate api with fewer abilities. Custom tabs I believe.
You can see for example that it always opens as a fullscreen overlay in your app and that it always has that bottom or in your case top bar. - Comment on New social experiment 2 months ago:
utilman.exe -> cmd.exe
- Comment on New social experiment 2 months ago:
stage3-amd64-systemd-20220904T170535Z.tar.xz
- Comment on Let's Encrypt is 10 years old today ! 4 months ago:
Yes, seems you are right. Not sure where I got the impression.
Unrelated, when I researched this I saw that acme.sh, zerossl, and a bunch of other acme clients are owned by the same entity, “Stack Holdings”/“apilayer.com”. According to this, zerossl also has some limitations over letsencrypt in account requirements and limits on free certificates.
By using ZeroSSL’s ACME feature, you will be able to generate an unlimited amount of 90-day SSL certificates at no charge, also supporting multi-domain certificates and wildcards. Each certificate you create will be stored in your ZeroSSL account.
It is suspicious that they impose so many restrictions then wave most on the acme api, where they presumably could not compete otherwise. On their gui they allow only 3 certificates and don’t allow multi-domain at all. Then even in the acme client they somehow push an account into the process.
[…] for using our ACME service you have to create and use EAB (External Account Binding) credentials within your ZeroSSL dashboard.
EAB credentials are limited to a maximum per user/per day. [This might be for creating them, not uses per credential, unsure how to interpret this.]
This all does make me slightly worry this block around apilayer.com will fall before letsencrypt does.
Other than letsencrypt and zerossl, this page also lists no other full equivalents for what letsencrypt does.
- Comment on Let's Encrypt is 10 years old today ! 4 months ago:
They don’t offer wildcard certs, but otherwise I think they are.
I wanna say acme.sh defaults to them. - Comment on Spanish Notations 5 months ago:
Why not both?
n! / k! ¡n-k! - Comment on Get that impact factor!! 5 months ago:
Damn, how’d you get your reviewers to write your entire paper for you?
- Comment on Steam games will now need to fully disclose kernel-level anti-cheat on store pages 5 months ago:
There is a sub for sanity checking mod actions, aita-style.
If you keep in mind it is for active unconfirmed situations, and that votes there are not meant to mark the cases of mod abuse, I think it can fill that niche.!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on D'awww who wants some scratches? 5 months ago:
Both, it’s a sign of trust nlt an invitation. They trust you with their vulnerable side and you betray that trust by play attacking it.
What follows after is justified.But these words can’t stop me because I can’t read
- Comment on After 11 years, Xbox One emulators are finally coming to PC - but they're not actually using emulation at all 6 months ago:
personal homepage hypertext preprocessor hypertext preprocessor
- Comment on "Would U.S. tech workers join a union?" survey average: 67% likely 6 months ago:
which also references an effort to use the media to quietly disseminate Google’s point of view about unionized tech workplaces.
Bogas’ order references an effort by Google executives, including corporate counsel Christina Latta, to “find a ‘respected voice to publish an op-ed outlining what a unionized tech workplace would look like,” and urging employees of Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google not to unionize.
in an internal message Google human resources director Kara Silverstein told Latta that she liked the idea, “but that it should be done so that there ‘would be no fingerprints and not Google specific.’”
From the article posted by 100_kg_90_de_belin.
Google seemingly does care about their internal image, so they will only make their actions obvious when they fire you for bogus reasons after wanting to join a union.
Quite nasty in that they give you no hints about how extreme their efforts on this are. They monitor internal employee tools like they are cosplaying the NSA, but you wouldn’t know before you are fired out of the blue.