Submitted â¨â¨3⊠â¨weeks⊠ago⊠by â¨tal@lemmy.today⊠to â¨technology@lemmy.worldâŠ
https://blog.catbox.moe/post/785233399498555392/important-catbox-needs-your-help
Crossposting from the other thread
I wonder what kind of of csam detection they have. If theyâre only relying on hash matching, theyâve gonna get fucked from novel genai csam. This is why stuff like the fedi-safety exists which they could use as well
Hash matching is really easy to get around. Literally modify 1 bit of the image or just re-encode the video and youâve gotten around it.
Yes, itâs the bare minimum precaution you can implement. But at the same time, itâs the bare minimum precaution you can implement. Thereâs really no excuse for not doing it, and it catches a shocking number of images.
Theyâll be using perceptual hashes, not file hashes.
Lots of lemmy content is hosted in catbox, hopefully they get it sorted. I sent a standalone donation, I prefer to host my own images so my usage doesnât warrant a monthly subscription.
Hopefully some of those heavy users pitch in.
Catbox has been super inconsistent in whether it even loads for the past year or so. Last few months it hasnât worked at all. Thought it might be my app but either way Iâd be glad to see lemmy move away from it.
The photos perfectly elaborate, though⌠They didnât really get screwed, someone uploaded âanimated child sexual abuse photos.â Which is not only illegal but against the TOS of Patreon.
Not really sure how this equates to them âbeing screwed.â Theyâre responsible for what people upload to their host which is why public uploads like this without restriction arenât a great idea.
Yeah, it really comes back to the idea of if a file hosting service is responsible for what the user uploads, which is an argument that has been going on since the beginning of the internet. Ultimately, yes, I think they are. I think you have to actively moderate what is uploaded, but on top of that, there has to be swifter and stricter punishment for those that do upload things that are against TOS and/or illegal. If someone is uploading CSAM, then law enforcement needs to go after them. Maybe theyâll actually do something people appreciate, instead of killing minorities.
Shit, I down voted you for whining about down votes.
Youâre being downvoted because your assertion that hosts are responsible for what users upload is generally false.
(1) Treatment of Publisher or Speaker.âNo provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
(2) Civil Liability.âNo provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account ofâ
(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
(B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in [subparagraph (A)].
47 USC § 230c, a.k.a. Communications Decency Act 1996 § 230
Ultimately, yes, I think they are.
Thereâs no opinion to be had. You are absolutely morally and legally responsible for what your users upload. Period.
Iâll gladly give you a reason. Iâm actually happy to articulate my stance on this, considering how much I tend to care about digital rights.
Services that host files should not be held responsible for what users upload, unless:
Because holding services responsible creates a whole host of negative effects. Hereâs some examples:
This isnât just my opinion either. Digital rights organizations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation have talked at length about similar policies before. To quote them:
âWhen social media platforms adopt heavy-handed moderation policies, the unintended consequences can be hard to predict. For example, Twitterâs policies on sexual material have resulted in posts on sexual health and condoms being taken down. YouTubeâs bans on violent content have resulted in journalism on the Syrian war being pulled from the site. It can be tempting to attempt to âfixâ certain attitudes and behaviors online by placing increased restrictions on usersâ speech, but in practice, web platforms have had more success at silencing innocent people than at making online communities healthier.â
Now, to address the rest of your comment, since I donât just want to focus on the beginning:
I think you have to actively moderate what is uploaded
Catbox does, and as previously mentioned, often at a much higher rate than other services, and at a comparable rate to many services that have millions, if not billions of dollars in annual profits that could otherwise be spent on further moderation.
there has to be swifter and stricter punishment for those that do upload things that are against TOS and/or illegal.
The problem isnât necessarily the speed at which people can be reported and punished, but rather that the internet is fundamentally harder to track people on than real life. Itâs easy for cops to sit around at a spot they know someone will be physically distributing illegal content at in real life, but digitally, even if you can see the feed of all the information passing through the service, a VPN or Tor connection will anonymize your IP address in a manner that most police departments wonât be able to track, and most three-letter agencies will simply have a relatively low success rate with.
Thereâs no good solution to this problem of identifying perpetrators, which is why platforms often focus on moderation over legal enforcement actions against users so frequently. It accomplishes the goal of preventing and removing the content without having to, for example, require every single user of the internet to scan an ID (and also magically prevent people from just stealing other peopleâs access tokens and impersonating their ID)
I do agree, however, that we should probably provide larger amounts of funding, training, and resources, to divisions whoâs sole goal is to go after online distribution of various illegal content, primarily that which harms children, because itâs certainly still an issue of there being too many reports to go through, even if many of them will still lead to dead ends.
I hope that explains why making file hosting services liable for user uploaded content probably isnât the best strategy. I hate to see people with good intentions support ideas that sound good in practice, but in the end just cause more untold harms, and I hope you can understand why I believe this to be the case.
To both host 130+ TB of data, and push 1 petabyte of traffic per month on any cloud provider would be, quite frankly, impossible.
Uhhh Iâm sorry but catbox isnât some special case here. Cloud providers are literally built to do this. Netflix literally hosted off of AWS for years. Also using cloudflare or another provider to reduce your needed bandwidth would make the costs sooooo much cheaper. And it probably would have stopped patreon from deleting them off of the platform since CF has CSAM detection and quarantining.
Thereâs plenty to be said about hosting things yourself, both good and bad, but in this case routing through CF really would have stopped a lot of this and reduced costs massively.
catbox is blocked by my ISP anyways due to the csam issue
What the hell is catbox.moe?
Isnât âmoeâ a weird anime/manga genre with hints of pedo motifs?
tal@lemmy.today â¨3⊠â¨weeks⊠ago
Just noticed this on !technology@beehaw.org, which lemmy.world is defederated with. As Iâve seen a number of people posting using catbox.moe to host content posted on here before, thought itâd be of broader interest.