edinbruh
@edinbruh@feddit.it
- Comment on reconnected with a childhood friend and he's coming over at 10pm 1 day ago:
I don’t think I get it. Is the joke that he came so early you were still exchanging names? Those are oddly specific questions. Or are you like gathering details for a scam?
- Comment on It's quite simple really 1 day ago:
This looks more complex than it needs to be. We can just merge those two IFF soundnesses at the top and remove transitive implications and we are left with a straight line with two bifurcations.
Also… I only know constructive logics and abstract interpretation with Galois connections… Where do they fit in this? 🥺
- Comment on nothing & no one is safe from this plague 1 week ago:
Things like this remind me of Terry Davis, who wrote a random words generator program and (due to schizophrenia) believed it was God speaking.
- Comment on Name this Paper 1 week ago:
Is this to measure calories? We did something similar in elementary school, our teacher would light a piece of snack on hanging above an aluminium dish, and we would count for how long it burned. Then we looked at the packaging and the snacks with more calories burned the longest.
- Comment on 1 week ago:
Clear and wave are the only real glass bricks, the rest is mental illnesses
- Comment on I LOVE EATING STIR BARS 2 weeks ago:
Lab Shelob behaviour
- Comment on The Ladies love it and it can provide protection during blackouts 2 weeks ago:
This is something out of Disco Elysium
- Comment on Say no to BAYES 3 weeks ago:
Now that I think about it, I think my teacher called it just “lussac’s law” because you cannot pronounce “Gay-Lussac” in front of a classroom of 14 year old boys. I guess you are right about the stories, but I’m not sure the name actually helps with that
- Comment on Say no to BAYES 3 weeks ago:
I’ll admit that was a bit of a stretch. But I also think the naming thing is a problem. Especially in mathematics, even when it is not named after a person, you often have no clue about what it is from just the name (i.e. what do you think is a magma in mathematics?)
- Comment on Was it better then or now? 3 weeks ago:
Noooo, Mickey! You fell for the AI
- Comment on Say no to BAYES 3 weeks ago:
Hey, in the end I got 28/30, I didn’t just barely pass the exam. It just sucks because I don’t like it and don’t want to study or know about it. Also there is a lot of gut feelings involved in statistics. Don’t pretend it’s like an exact science or something. You make your calculations and it spits out a number and you go like “hmmmm I do not vibe with this number. This stuff feels more important so I want a better number” the calculations themselves involve a lot of “hmm this data feels like it benefits from this approach”
- Comment on Say no to BAYES 3 weeks ago:
No, it’s my belief. I was forced to do statistics at school from a young age, and it polarized me.
It all started in kindergarten, when the teacher wanted us to take polls of stuff like favourite colours and such, and find the mode of the polls, and I didn’t want to pay attention to other kids’ favourite colours so mine were always wrong.
Then it continued through elementary, middle, and high school, and I often failed statistics tests, because they always had you calculate ludicrous amounts of differences and squares and means and I would inevitably make mistakes. My maths average was 9/10 regardless, but I hated statistics.
Then I had to take a statistics exam for my bachelor degree in computer science, and I failed and had to retake it next year.
Then I had to take a second statistics exam for my master’s degree in computer science that I’m pursuing right now. And I failed that and had to retake it.
And this is how I specialised in formal verification and abstract interpretation. Many such cases.
- Comment on At least one of the 7 letters has still some relevante to my life. 3 weeks ago:
I thought this was science memes! What’s statistics doing here?
- Comment on deez nutz save lives 3 weeks ago:
Get them coconut electrolytes
- Comment on Say no to BAYES 3 weeks ago:
Say no to statistics altogether. If we form a compact front, we can eradicate the disease of statistics from the face of the earth.
As motivation, I’ll explain why statistics is only good for stealing:
- Statistics is used to invest in the stock market, which is stealing by definition
- Statistics is the foundation of modern AI, which as of now is mostly used for stealing work and intellectual property
- There is no real statistical research, but every other paper is forced to have a little useless graph and a p-value made by some statistician, who steals fame from the real researchers who made the rest of the paper
- Statistics is at the core of the gambling industry, which preys and steals from the elderly and economically weak
- Every fucking formula for calculating probability needs to have a “mathematician’s” name even if it’s always sums and scaling that a toddler could come up with. Remembering those names steals neurons from students
- Etcetera
- Comment on A succulent meal 3 weeks ago:
The day after it’s fine. The next day it’s meh. Provided you keep it in a paper bag and not out in the air
- Comment on A succulent meal 3 weeks ago:
The 0.62€ industrial baguette I buy at Despar Is fine and not dry despite being industrial
- Comment on A succulent meal 3 weeks ago:
Plain bread is perfectly fine as long as it’s not one of those super dry breads
- Comment on [deleted] 3 weeks ago:
She looks like no shape a human body would produce
- Comment on Porca miseria! 4 weeks ago:
Calpestami mammina
- Comment on halal paintball 4 weeks ago:
I only did paintball once, and that place didn’t use gelatin balls, I think they were made of a thin bioplastic film (corn stuff) filled with ink
- Comment on Get that silicussy 4 weeks ago:
The one on the right is hotter
- Comment on Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster 5 weeks ago:
This looks like a success to me. Just imagine this: replace the thicket with the enemy army, you fire one shot and the rest of the army retreats.
- Comment on Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster 5 weeks ago:
Pepsi and milk
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
🫣
Wait, how old is this guy? 🤨
Also, this doesn’t answer how awkward was the shittalk
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Yes, do
I’m mostly curious about how awkward the talking part was, and if the 200£ were real
- Comment on [deleted] 5 weeks ago:
Well, did you?
- Comment on Even centuries ago they had deep thoughts 5 weeks ago:
- Comment on Real and True 1 month ago:
In the normal part of the diagram?
🥺
👉👈 - Comment on Real and True 1 month ago:
Mine is not here. Ultrawide, with regular above it