deaf_fish
@deaf_fish@midwest.social
- Comment on We live wasted lives 2 days ago:
Yeah, honestly knowing what I know now, this is the way to do it. Do whatever you want for most of your life and screw the consequences. Die at 35 without health insurance.
- Comment on We live wasted lives 2 days ago:
I’m glad 1 hour of porn and telescope each day keeps you going. For most of us, it’s not enough.
It would be nice to not be alienated at work. It would also be nice to have some kind of say in what we do 80% of the time we’re awake. A more democratized workplace would do a lot.
- Comment on Sincerely, your literally poorest europoor. 3 days ago:
American here. You should come make us stop. I’d like to see you try.
- Comment on Software is evolving backwards 1 week ago:
No devolving makes sense. The natural pressures are causing the user interface to be worse.
- Comment on I'm gonna mute this one 2 weeks ago:
You’ve posted a good argument to a discussion that we are not currently having in this thread. You may need to take a little break from Lemmy.
- Comment on Suggestion 2 weeks ago:
To live is to cringe.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
I guess the important thing really is that you are having fun.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Do you often Google words on montage memes made with Ms paint?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Aww, poop. I got my comments mixed up. Sorry and thanks again.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Whoa, hold on, I just finally got new information. The information I have been asking for all day. I now believe they killed the bird intentionally. Did you have that link? If, so, why didn’t you send it to me?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Whoa, hold on, I just finally got new information. The information I have been asking for all day. I now believe they killed the bird intentionally. Did you have that link? If, so, why didn’t you send it to me?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
This is what I have been asking for all day. Your the first person to provide me with some actual information. Thanks! After seeing this, I think the person did intend to kill the seagull. I don’t know if it rises to psychopathy, but everyone else’s reactions seem to make sense.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Why would I say that?
Oh, wait, I just noticed, your the person I was discussing with in the other thread. Glad your still having fun! I take it this is the end of any meaningful discussion we have on this topic.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Wait, I didn’t know he hulk-smashed it. Where is that piece of information? Is there like a video of it?
Please there must be something I am missing, otherwise a lot of people on this post are just idiots. And that can’t be right.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
No, I meant what I said.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
I guess the important thing is that you’re having fun.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Whoa, sorry, I didn’t mean to sound ableist. I make mistakes with my muscle control as much as the next person does.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Ok, to be clear. Your argument is that accidently killing a bird makes you a psychopath. Do I have that right?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Ah, so now we have to figure out if there was intent kill let alone intent to brutally kill. I think this thread is where I am having this discussion , but let me know if you think it is too far off and want to start your own. midwest.social/post/29695120/18026340
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
What is happening right now? Are you writing a book? Is this roll play?
You know, if you have some information or an augment against my point. You can just say it. Wrapping it in sarcasm or whatever that last post was, doesn’t help me and others understand what you are getting at. Also, it doesn’t make you look very good.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Thanks for self reporting your spousal abuse I guess.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Wait so you’re saying everything you do is full force?
In my experience I can adjust the power and speed I use to do things. This must be blowing your mind.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
So your implying he used full force? How do you know that, is there a video?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
How do we know they intended to kill the bird and not give it a light bonk? Where did you see he disregarded their reactions?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
So all not normal things are psychotic?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 2 weeks ago:
Why is everyone jumping to the psychopath narrative? Is there background on this guy? Why bring up crying children? This feels like a Phy Op to me and some people replying in this post are glowing a bit…
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 3 weeks ago:
I can see you don’t really care the details here. Have a nice life.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 3 weeks ago:
I don’t understand how these two statements don’t contradict each other.
reduce the overall population or
Killing one seagull or rat if there is hundreds of them in some area achieves neither of the three
So, we doom the man to be a psycho even though he may not be one?
may mean that this person has either psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies
Thus, fucking psycho.
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 3 weeks ago:
But two rats will eventually create 100 rats. So you are kind of creating more death. Why not just kill the two rats?
- Comment on Luv Me Chips, 'ate Seagulls... 3 weeks ago:
This statement?
You are trying to kill as many individuals in a very short time span to cripple the population growth
So if a house had one rat, killing it wouldn’t count as pest control because it’s not killing many individuals?