Yareckt
@Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com
- Comment on I don't know what this means, but it's been stuck in my head. 12 hours ago:
Slythy toves die gyre and gimble in the wabe
- Comment on Why American Films Are Objectively The Best, post # 1/17 1 day ago:
Obligatory post highlighting some oft the good stuff thats come out of Europe (without Britain or Australia):
- The Devil’s bath
- Portrait of a young woman in flames
- Call me by your name
- Another round
- Confessions of Felix Krull
- Sun and concrete
- All Quiet on the Western Front
- Comment on Everybody poops 1 day ago:
Oh I’m stupid. I meant the other left.
- Comment on Everybody poops 1 day ago:
What’s the second to the left figure
- Comment on I don't get this trend, but there's a moth on my ceiling. Enjoy ! 1 week ago:
- Comment on MothDonalds 1 week ago:
Those are lit!
- Comment on UK firm achieves first commercial tritium breakthrough for fusion fuel 2 weeks ago:
The article also doesn’t mention how much they produced, if the produced tritium can be reintroduced back into the reaction and if it’s feasible to regulate the dose of production
- Comment on PicklED 2 weeks ago:
This has gone too far
- Comment on We don't have 2 weeks ago:
It’s still interesting
- Comment on is white light "white" because that's what our start emits? 3 weeks ago:
I’d assume if we lived on a world where UV or infrared wavelengths were the most intense we’d evolve eyes to work around the problems that our eyes have. There probably is an upper and lower limit to the wavelengths that animals on earth have adapted to and there probably also is some physical limit (imagine wavelengths of 1 kilometer). However the ability to see in the wavelength that is most intense is a big advantage since everything that does photosynthesis is probably that colour and being able to see those tasty morsels would be an advantage.
- Comment on is white light "white" because that's what our start emits? 3 weeks ago:
It depends on if our cone cells which are responsible for colour reception would have evolved differently. With our current sun and atmosphere they have evolved to perceive a range of wavelengths that are the most abundant/intense and don’t have a drop in intensity in the middle. Here is a graph showing solar and terrestrial wavelength intensities compared to wavelengths we have evolved to see.
So to find out if the range of wavelengths we are able to see would be different if our star were a red dwarf we would need to take the emission spectrum of the star you’d want to replace our star with(the orange part), then remove from that the percentages of each wavelength that our atmosphere absorbs to get the terrestrial wavelength intensities (the dark blue part). Then you could probaly look at that graph and take a chunk out of the Y-axis that covers the highest intensity wavelengths (cause plants would probably have that colour and we’d want to see those) while not getting too long and also trying to avoid lower intensity dips in wavelength. Then you’ve got your visible colour range. If that range is the same as our current one then white stays white. In general objects that appear to us as white reflect or emit a mix of waves with different wavelengths in such a way that we perceive the total of it as roughly equally blue, red and green. If the visible colour range we perceive is different, then our cone cells would also be triggered at different wavelengths.
- Comment on To the admins: Thank you. 3 weeks ago:
Thank you for hosting so many great communities :)
- Comment on Germany Is Using AI to Erase Pro-Palestinian Speech 4 weeks ago:
Following the headlines logic: Germany is angry at this post right now for overgeneraling them in a topic where there are a lot of fake news and and propaganda spreading actors already. Germany will now go and make itself tea.
- Comment on AI video just took a startling leap in realism. Are we doomed? 4 weeks ago:
Some of the failed ones are genuinely scary
- Comment on the 'it' in 'it snows' doesn't refer to anything 4 weeks ago:
Sry. Activated by accident
- Comment on the 'it' in 'it snows' doesn't refer to anything 4 weeks ago:
Yeah I didn’t know that tbh.
- Comment on What games are just objective master pieces? 4 weeks ago:
Half-life 3
- Comment on the 'it' in 'it snows' doesn't refer to anything 4 weeks ago:
That somehow feels right. I still kind of want some phrase that you could substitute for it though. The most correct feeling thing I could think of are seasons as in ‘the summer rains’. But from a logical standpoint a concept that is defined by humans producing something material doesn’t really make sense since a concept isn’t material.
- Comment on the 'it' in 'it snows' doesn't refer to anything 4 weeks ago:
Which sentence do you mean?
- Comment on the 'it' in 'it snows' doesn't refer to anything 4 weeks ago:
‘It’s raining’ must refer to the same it as the one in ‘it rains’. From that we can gather that the entity referred by ‘it’ must be quite capable as it can do the raining as well as be raining. However ‘It’s cold outside’ could refer to the air as in the air is cold outside. Similarly the ‘it’ in ‘it is the case’ needs some context in a prior sentence or something else in the real world otherwise the sentence doesn’t make sense.
- Submitted 4 weeks ago to showerthoughts@lemmy.world | 25 comments
- Comment on Cheers lads an lassies 5 weeks ago:
That’s 3 from ‘Starwars 3’
- Comment on All form is interpretation. 1 month ago:
All knowledge is models
- Comment on The hills are alive with the sound of music! 🎶🎵 1 month ago:
I can’t go out in summer cause people I constantly have to say no homo and people keep looking at me all weird
- Comment on The kerning on the pope’s tomb is a travesty 1 month ago:
I think it’s OK. It looks very normal in this video. Not perfect is fine for a Pope who wanted the grave of a normal person.
- Comment on When you are ruining your day ranting about something remember THIS 2 months ago:
One is on the right side. The other on the left
- Comment on passing through 2 months ago:
Nah. Jesus is rising from the dead and the pope is joining them
- Comment on bad case lowly brain worms 2 months ago:
Are those nails?
- Comment on The best thing *you* can do for the fediverse is *just be kind* 2 months ago:
I said don’t engage with spam bots. And no I can’t fully ignore baseless negative comments when I see them. They still register in my brain. I would need to have a filter in my brain or eyes that blanks them out. I wish I had one. Because they affect me even if they aren’t directed at me. Not in the same way but more in the sense that when you see a mother hitting her child on the train you feel compelled to say something. If I don’t I feel a sting and it doesn’t sit well with me. Because I care about others in general. Not implying you don’t. I know not everyone is a helpless child but a lot of people are mentally not in a state where they have the ability to deal with this stuff myself included sometimes. That’s also why I try to be kind to strangers on the internet in general.
- Comment on The best thing *you* can do for the fediverse is *just be kind* 2 months ago:
You have been lied to
