BreadOven
@BreadOven@lemmy.world
- Comment on Something has gone awry 2 weeks ago:
Awesome, thanks for the reply.
- Comment on Something has gone awry 3 weeks ago:
I’d guess active yeast (as another commenter mentioned) maybe a slight temperature spike? Possibly a finer grain milling?
I don’t have too much experience on the homebrew scale, but would be interested to hear what it was (if you can determine it).
- Comment on It's a hard life 3 weeks ago:
What about beans?
- Comment on The salt trick helping men stay hard 3 weeks ago:
From an oxygen embolism?
- Comment on Fake Grannies vs Actual Grannies 5 weeks ago:
Is the bottom right a female Geddy Lee?
- Comment on ugh i wish 2 months ago:
Pasteurization doesn’t boil the milk though…
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Woah, no need to get so angry, I’m merely asking questions (which you’re not providing answers to).
I’m refuting the one thing you’ve mentioned multiple times; the “contaminated” source of fluoride. You make it seem like it’s dangerous because “it comes from the smoke stack scrubbers of fertilizer plants.” Why do you keep bringing this up?
Since you brought it, up have you studied this at a university level? While I have not directly studied the fluoridation of water in university, I have studied chemistry. That is where all my questions are coming from. I’m not concerned about this from a dental perspective.
While that article is peer-reviewed and has sources, it’s pertaining to a very specific region, and also is published in a fairly obscure journal with a trash impact factor.
This is also the first I’ve heard mention of pre-eruption benefits of fluoride. I’ve never stated I believe this, and have not heard anyone else mention this in favour of fluoridation.
Also as I mentioned in a previous comment, I am in no way saying the individual with a PhD in a social science is “full of shit”. I’m just saying the article is an opinion piece, and reads like a conspiracy theorist wrote it. Think Charlie and Pepe Silvia from IASIP.
Many scientists (research-based) go into public policy as well. Mainly because they’re capable of thinking critically and are able to contribute to policy in their area of expertise.
Also for the third time, are you a scientist, or have any scientific background?
Doesn’t questioning all these things you’re saying display critical thinking?
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Well firstly, you did not provide any specific contaminants. You did mention heavy metals, which are inherently in normal ground water. They are also controlled, as I mentioned in my last post.
Can you provide a source that states there’s no processing of “it”? Can you also state what exactly “it” is? NaF, HF, SiCl4, or something else?
Also, for the third time, are you some sort of scientist? Especially one who would have knowledge of actual chemistry?
If I don’t get at least somewhat of a semblance of intelligence in your reply, this is over, and you should really try to accept people trying to educate you on topics you clearly don’t know.
As I’ve said at least a couple times, I’d be happy to provide multiple sources proving F- in water is safe. I will even help walk you through these sources. I’m all for educating people.
So, please don’t reply with some stupid shit stated in that shitpost of an article you linked.
I’m genuinely trying to help/educate. So please take me up on the offer if you would like to.
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Contaminated with what exactly?
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Hmmm. The author of the article has a PhD in environmental history, so a social science. Nothing wrong with that at all, but it’s not actual hard science. Where people research and develop novel things.
I don’t want to blow smoke anywhere near any asses. But does that article site one primary literature source? They’re all articles or if it’s an actual paper, it’s an opinion piece. I’m not going through all of them because it reads like some crazy uncle on a conspiracy theory rant.
Are you a scientist? I know what I’m talking about, although I’m afraid you’re not.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-99688-w
There’s an actual journal article (I know it’s only Nature scientific reports, but it’s a valid reference). I know it doesn’t explicitly state it’s not toxic, but:
“Thus, based on the evidence available on the topic, it is not possible to state neither any association or the lack of an association between F exposure and any neurological disorder.”
Taken straight from their conclusion.
Obviously there’s many more sources, and again, I’m happy to provide you with some of you’d like to enhance your knowledge on the subject.
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
I did say “any” science.
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
I’ve heard it works much better and actually reverses the mind control if you first mix the bleach with ammonia.
(Also, please, don’t actually do this, some people still die every year from this)
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Fun fact. Literally everyone who has died, ever, has had DHMO in some form. You’re even exposed in the womb!
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
If that’s actually your idea of a valid source, and you’re not just trolling…I feel so sorry for you.
That article is just not correct. I can’t even begin to point out all the flaws in it.
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Have you done any science?
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Agreed. That’s why I only drink DMSO.
(Don’t actually drink DMSO please.)
- Comment on Bat Identification Guide (by @bedupolker.bsky.social ) 2 months ago:
I think you’re right.
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
Well sorry, I suppose I didn’t need to call your comment asinine.
But this is not an unknown issue. Multitudes of testing throughout decades have shown there is no toxicity for the levels that are in water. The county you’re living in most likely has their own case study available for you to read.
I can look at issues without prejudice, but valid issues. This is not one of those.
Also, if you’re talking about toxicity due to dose, you’ll die from water consumption before you’d get anywhere near toxic levels of fluoride. Don’t even think about any sort of medication you’re taking, it’s also probably more toxic than the levels of fluoride in water.
Again, sorry. I don’t want to be mean, but there’s so much information out there opposing your comment. I’d happily point you in the right direction if you’d like to read up on the plethora of resources stating it’s not toxic, and at least somewhat beneficial.
- Comment on flouride 2 months ago:
No. It can’t be said for fluoride. Lead is known to be extremely toxic. We’ve seen what it does. Fluoride in water is not toxic, which has been shown multiple times.
Your argument is asinine.
- Comment on Bat Identification Guide (by @bedupolker.bsky.social ) 2 months ago:
How’s your sex life?
- Comment on \#GundamNoContext 2 months ago:
Not sure which this is from? Doan’s island?
- Comment on \#GundamNoContext 2 months ago:
Seig zeon?
- Comment on If Orange Dickhead dies before taking his oath again will we party like it's 1999? 2 months ago:
For the record, I’m not American. I have also tried my best to keep myself out of reading anything related to such things related to the recently elected “president” and his running mate. Although, I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re correct. I hope it’s not the case, but I’m not holding my breath.
- Comment on If Orange Dickhead dies before taking his oath again will we party like it's 1999? 2 months ago:
Nor would I. But I can’t help myself from feeling that it would be an overall win.
- Comment on If Orange Dickhead dies before taking his oath again will we party like it's 1999? 2 months ago:
I will party like it’s whatever year. As long as that shit stain is dead. Hopefully with his lackey.
- Comment on Roses are red in North Carolina..... 2 months ago:
Perfection.
- Comment on Corn? I DAUHN REMEMBAH EATING ANY CORN! 2 months ago:
This is how we do it.
- Comment on That's no Moon Moon 2 months ago:
That’s no moon boy! No moon!
- Comment on You can't take me seriously 2 months ago:
Classic.
- Comment on Tag your lab-mates 2 months ago:
I’m the fish in the harmful to aquatic life one.