Picture make it look like Zucc mullet
Zuckerberg says Meta's Llama 3 is really good but no chatbot is sophisticated enough to be an 'existential' threat — yet
Submitted 6 months ago by Dragxito@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.world
Comments
Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 6 months ago
tourist@lemmy.world 6 months ago
highly advanced diffusion model for the zullet
iamanurd@midwest.social 6 months ago
This is what I came for! Party in the zuccerback!
GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 months ago
That’s exactly what a chatbot sophisticated enough to be an existential threat would say.
lemmyvore@feddit.nl 6 months ago
Well, he would know.
JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Say an android
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Oh to punch that face
EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 6 months ago
He’s, surprisingly, a fucking fighter.
tacotroubles@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Hes got that lizard robot strength
istanbullu@lemmy.ml 6 months ago
I don’t buy into this “AI is dangerous” hype. Humans are dangerous.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
“ooh it’s more advanced but don’t worry- it’s not conscious”
is as much a marketing tactic as “how it feels to chew 5 gum” or buzzfeedesque “top 10 celebrity mistakes - number 3 will blow your mind”
it’s a tech product that runs a series of complicated loops against a large series of texts and returns the closest comparison, as it stands it’s never going to be dangerous in and of itself.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Generative AI and LLMs is not what people mean when they’re talking about the dangers of AI. What we worry about doesn’t exist yet.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 6 months ago
AI can be dangerous. The point is not that it’s likely but that in the very unlikely event of it going rogue it can at worst have civilication ending consequences. Imagine how easy it is to trick a child as an adult. The difference in intelligence between a human and superintelligent AGI would be orders of magnitude greater that that.
conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
An actual AI (that modern tools don’t even vaguely resemble) could maybe theoretically be dangerous.
An LLM cannot be dangerous. There’s no path to anything resembling intelligence or agency.
Sneptaur@pawb.social 6 months ago
He’s right you know
Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Damn, every new picture of Zuckerberg I see looks more like a fucking android
GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 months ago
The thumbnail made me think he had a mullet
General_Effort@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Behind every successful man there is a woman, making him look like he has a mullet.
boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Synthetic
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 months ago
One day, he will be an android and we won’t notice.
All this time Android-Zuck will tell us were totally on the verge of real AGI that can dominate the world, but not yet.
65gmexl3@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Unlike lemmy comments always hating zuck, its refreshing to see comments like this being grateful with meta
xcjs@programming.dev 6 months ago
I was reflecting on this myself the other day. For all my criticisms of Zuckerberg/Meta (which are very valid), they really didn’t have to release anything concerning LLaMA. They’re practically the only reason we have viable open source weights/models.
dtrain@lemmy.world 6 months ago
The thumbnail shows Mark Mulletburg.
not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Why would we listen to a robot in human skin?
noodlejetski@lemm.ee 6 months ago
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] 6 months ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Meta launched the latest iteration of its AI chatbot on Thursday with Llama 3, and CEO Mark Zuckerberg says it’s supposed to be really good.
The new model boasts “state-of-the-art” performance on various industry-standard benchmarks and comes with “improved reasoning,” according to a company blog post.
“In terms of all of the concerns around the more existential risks, I don’t think that anything at the level of what we or others in the field are working on in the next year is really in the ballpark of those types of risks,” he told the publication.
It’s one reason Zuckerberg feels that the company can continue making Llama open-source or available for the public or researchers to tinker with.
If Meta’s model achieves multimodality — meaning the ability to deliver results in various forms of media, including text, images, and video — then that may be a case when the company won’t want to make all aspects of its model open-source, Zuckerberg said.
"For example, image generation is one that we’re looking at closely Especially in an election year, is that a net positive thing to do?
The original article contains 314 words, the summary contains 186 words. Saved 41%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
kromem@lemmy.world 6 months ago
It’s not as good as it seems at the surface.
It is a model squarely in the “fancy autocomplete” category along with GPT-3 and fails miserably at variations of logic puzzles in ways other contemporary models do not.
It seems that the larger training data set allows for better modeling around the fancy autocomplete parts, but even other similarly sized models like Mistral appear to have developed better underlying critical thinking capacities when you scratch below the surface that are absent here.
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Meta’s lead AI researcher is one of the loudest voices criticizing the views around emergent capabilities. There seems to be a degree of self-fulfilling prophecy going on. A lot of useful learnings in the creation of Llama, but once other models (i.e. Mistral) also start using extended training my guess is that any apparent advantages to Llama 3 right now are going to go out the window.
BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 6 months ago
The 8B is incredible for it’s size and they’ve managed to do sane refusal training this time for the official instruct.
Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 6 months ago
The thumbnail looks like a chatbot trying to wave convincingly
kautau@lemmy.world 6 months ago
With a mullet lol
bobburger@fedia.io 6 months ago
A chatbot with a sick mullet