Some real estate dickhead just rang my mobile (which is not advertised anywhere) saying they were “just in the area” and wanted to do an appraisal on a house we own in <suburb name>.
It’s an agency we don’t use for any purpose, have never used for any purpose, and have never approached for any reason.
Is there some sort of legal issue with some smarmy sales knob looking up property owner details and cold calling them?
Makes me feel all gross that their grubby mitts are pawing through my deets somewhere in the hope of being able to stick a tongue up my bum and get a taste of some back door cash.
Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 months ago
There should be a law against owning properties you don’t live in.
That said fucking with real estate agents I can get behind so do whatever on that front. Maybe consider not being a landlord though.
M500@lemmy.ml 9 months ago
I can think of a few exceptions. But I think owning multiple properties in the same location for more than a specified amount of time should be illegal or heavily taxed.
For example, you buy a home and are still trying to sell an old one. You might own two houses for some time. You might inherit a house and need to sell it.
You might have family in multiple parts of the country or work in multiple parts of the country/world and need a place to live.
A friend’s mom had severe asthma and was told to leave her home state during the winter and live in Florida.
But I have a friend who owns like 3 hours in the same neighborhood just as rental properties. That should be illegal/heavily taxed.
Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 months ago
mao-aggro-shining
trk@aussie.zone 9 months ago
Yeah, it’s a pity there isn’t a law against it I guess. If I sold that one extra house I’m hoarding the housing crisis would be pretty much over tbh.
Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 months ago
I get what you are saying about this not being a matter of personal individual responsibility, but coming on hear and complaining about a telemarketer that you could just ignore is pretty fucking insensitive to all the unhoused folks that you could be helping by just not being a rent-seeking parasite.
Taleya@aussie.zone 9 months ago
yeah yeah, no snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible.
Nath@aussie.zone 9 months ago
I’m trying to picture what this looks like. Who do we rent from if we can’t afford to buy a house in this alternate vision of the future? There is no way that 20-year-old me working at servos had the capital to buy a house. I had zero savings and a low income.
I see you invoking the Maoist uprising in another comment, but I’ll be honest - the years following that uprising were hard for a huge swathe of the population (not to mention fatal for Millions more). I would not want to live through a Chairman Mao. Modern China happened despite Mao. Not because of him.
Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 months ago
You literally cannot conceive of a reality wherein a home does not have to be rented from a parasitic landlord?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 9 months ago
The practice of “renting” needs to die in a goddamn fire. Single family homes should never be “rented”. Temporary (6-month to 5-year) occupancy of a single family home should be done under a “land contract”.
Basically, the occupant starts making mortgage payments (principle, interest, taxes, insurance) but title stays with the landlord. The landlord receives only the “interest” part of the payment. The “principle” part of the payment is held in escrow, in an interest-bearing account. This is the occupant’s equity in the home.
If the occupant stays through the term of the contract, title transfers to the occupant, the escrowed principle payments transfer to the landlord, and the contract converts to a private mortgage. If the occupant leaves before the term of the contract, the principle payments are returned to them.
Land contracts build tenant wealth and drive people toward home ownership.
GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 9 months ago
If you think it was hard to live under Mao, you should see what it was like before him.
Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 9 months ago
What was it like to live in China before 1949 compared to after 1949? Please support your assertions with relevant statistics.
Marsupial@quokk.au 9 months ago
www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-04/…/102639674
Taleya@aussie.zone 9 months ago
not sure we go that far (in a sane system rentals have their place) but absolutely start taxing the ever loving shit out of anything over the PPR. The more houses the more tax. More. More. MOOOOOOOOOORE.
And ban corporations / companies / business entities from owning standalone housing and land.
Nakoichi@hexbear.net 9 months ago
Literally the only way to achieve this is through some sort of revolution. Reformism is impossible under the dictatorship of capital.